Sociological factors influencing the practice of incident reporting: the case of the shipping industry

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the ways in which underlying social and organisational factors and employment relations underpin the practice of incident reporting in the international shipping industry.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses a qualitative case study method involving field trips to two shipping organisations and sailing on research voyages on two ships of each of the organisations. It draws on empirical data using semi‐structured interviews, notes from fieldwork observations and documentary analysis of company policies, procedures and practices.FindingsIn the two companies studied there were significant gaps between the policy and practice of incident reporting, which were present primarily due to the employees' fear of losing jobs. It is shown that these findings were manifestations of deeper sociological issues and organisational weaknesses in the shipping industry. In particular ineffective regulatory infrastructure, weak employment practices, the absence of trade union support and lack of organisational trust were the key underlying concerns which made incident reporting notably ineffective in the shipping context.Originality/valueWhile the weaknesses in the practice of incident reporting in the shipping industry were reported in the past, previous studies did not offer further explanations. This paper addresses the gap and provides another illustration of the need for looking into deeper sociological underpinnings for practices in the workplace. The author also hopes that the study will have a positive impact on policy makers in the shipping industry.

Beyond the management–employee dyad: supply chain initiatives in shipping

“…In the shipping industry, while the International Transport Workers' Federation, a global maritime union association, has developed effective bargaining strategies with ship managers to raise labour standards globally, the isolation and mobility of ships nevertheless act as barriers for union organisations to support seafarers at the workplace level (Kahveci and Nichols, ; Lillie, ). In the interviews, while seafarers stated to be aware of the International Transport Workers' Federation, they did not see any relevance of unions on board their ships (Bhattacharya, ). Unable to consolidate their structural power into associational power, understandably, seafarers could only take chances to leverage the supply chain pressure individually and sporadically in the shadow of managers' coercive power.…”

How can stakeholders promote environmental and social responsibility in the shipping industry?

“…In addition, the size of the shipboard crew has been dramatically reduced and the profession tends to be characterized by relatively inferior working conditions and high insecurity due to short-term contracts and a high crew turnover (Bhattacharya 2011;Progoulaki and Theotokas 2010). Even though the companies are unlikely to solely be influenced by employee demands, employees can gain power by using indirect strategies: as will be shown later, employees need to work in alliances and be supported by NGOs, trade unions, and/or different national or international regulatory bodies.…”

Examining Factors that Influence the Existence of Heinrich's Safety Triangle Using Site‐Specific H&S Data from More than 25,000 Establishments

“…(9) Either stemming directly from Heinrich's work or from follow-up theory-building efforts, numerous interrelated arguments have been made that provide the rationale behind the use of historical incident data and the safety pyramid assumptions to inform OSH management decisions in an effort to reduce the probability of high severity OSH outcomes. (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) Noted benefits span the levels of the ecological model.…”