2010
DOI: 10.1080/09557570903433647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociology and international relations: legacies and prospects

Abstract: While sociological concepts have often been implicitly used in International Relations (IR), recent years have seen a more explicit engagement between IR and Sociology. As with any such interdisciplinary assignation, there are both possibilities and challenges contained within this move: possibilities in terms of reducing IR's intellectual autism and opening the discipline towards potentially fertile terrain that was never, actually, that distant; challenges in that interdisciplinary raiding parties can often … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the clearest examples of entanglement have been identified in the study of empire in International Relations and sociology (Bhambra , ; Go , ; Hobden and Hobson ; Lawson and Shilliam ; Steinmetz ). In these literatures, empire is more than a past historical episode, or even a latter‐day revival of empire in light of the post‐Cold War reality of US global dominance.…”
Section: State‐space Beyond Territorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the clearest examples of entanglement have been identified in the study of empire in International Relations and sociology (Bhambra , ; Go , ; Hobden and Hobson ; Lawson and Shilliam ; Steinmetz ). In these literatures, empire is more than a past historical episode, or even a latter‐day revival of empire in light of the post‐Cold War reality of US global dominance.…”
Section: State‐space Beyond Territorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many points that are raised by the interaction between IR and HS, we believe the following three are especially relevant when examining the crisis in the Middle East: the need to escape essentialism; Euro‐centrism; and methodological nationalism (Bhambra, ; Chernilo, ; Matin, ; Wimmer & Glick‐Schiller, ). HS in IR (Hobden, ; Lawson, , ; Lawson & Shilliam, ; Rosenberg, ) has produced important work in these directions, and the Middle East as a region (Halliday, ; Hoffmann & Cemgil, ; Matin, )has already been the focus of some of these works. Yet much empirical research is still needed not only to grasp the current crisis in all its path‐dependencies but also to further the HS research agenda in new directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admittedly, HS is a very diverse research programme (Lawson & Shilliam, 2010;Nexon, Hobden, & Hobson, 2003) and this diversity only increases when it is practiced alongside the paradigms of other disciplinary venues, such as the International Relations (IR). Among the many points that are raised by the interaction between IR and HS, we believe the following three are especially relevant when examining the crisis in the Middle East: the need to escape essentialism; Euro-centrism; and methodological nationalism (Bhambra, 2010;Chernilo, 2010;Matin, 2012b;Wimmer & Glick-Schiller, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (2000): 43-76; Lawson, George & Robbie Shilliam, “Sociology and international Relations: Legacies and Prospects,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23, no. 1 (2010): 69-86; Sylvester, Christine, “The Elusive Arts of Reflexivity in the ‘Sciences’ of International Relations,” Millennium 41, no. 2 (2013): 309-325.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%