Sociology's Complexity

Abstract

Engaging with recent keynote reflections on 'sociology at the end of the millennium', this article critically examines ways in which the current discourse of complexity can be related to characterizations of the intellectual style of sociology.After taking issue with the familiar characterization of sociology as quintessentially modernist, where modernist equates to 'reductionist' and 'simplistic', three more specific interventions are construed as contributions to the complexity debate. One is the growing preference for inter-and post-disciplinarity over traditional (sociological) disciplinarity.The second is John Urry's proposal for new rules of sociological method along the lines of chaos and complexity theory. The third is the assumption that in the 'network society' analysis of authors like Manuel Castells we have a substantive account which conforms directly to that fluid philosophical mind-set, rather than to conventional sociological framings. Since I do not seek to devalue complexity discourse as such, and since I advance support for the idea of trans-disciplinarity, the aims of this article are not merely conservative. However, each of the three lines of thought considered is defective, and the complexity of sociological discourse itself merits greater recognition. KEY WORDScomplexity theory / millennialism / network society / post-disciplinarity / sociology

Beck, individualization and the death of class: a critique1

“…As John Urry (2003: 95), an erstwhile contributor to class theory, has recently insisted, in the new world of ‘global complexity’ sociology must unremorsefully jettison its old theoretical schemes, including that of ‘class domination’, and effectively ‘start from scratch’. Yet within this influential stream of thought – which, as McLennan (2003) has shown, has an unfortunate tendency to adumbrate a new conceptual apparatus without convincingly demonstrating the inadequacy of ‘traditional’ sociology for grasping its problematics – Beck's perspective remains one of the most explicit and sustained efforts to illustrate exactly why and how class is outdated. Exposing its errors whilst demonstrating class to be a more flexible concept than assumed might thus give good cause to question the claims of those theorists content to declare the redundancy of class on the basis of a rather more cursory analysis.…”

The Division of Labour in Crime Prevention: Crime Science, Criminology and Criminal Justice

“…Indeed, some commentators describe any feigns toward interdisciplinary co‐operation as thinly‐veiled ‘disciplinary imperialism’ (Sayer ). However, this view is perhaps more cynical than warranted (McLennan ).…”

“…As long as a unit runs courses in a subject that continues to enroll students, whose staff have qualifications in that subject and a vested interest in the way in which it is currently framed … such disciplines will be resistant to attempts at reframing … Inertia conferred by traditional discipline frames and academic and institutional self‐interest tend to create silos of research activity occurring in parallel, unaware of, or more usually indifferent to, each other, and hostile to those inhabiting adjacent frames’ (pp.6–7). This sentiment is expressed in sociological corners as well (McLennan ).…”

Theological Implications of Young Earth Creationism and Intelligent Design: Emerging Tendencies of Scientism and Agnosticism

“…According to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, 51 there are aspects of the world that cannot be determined simultaneously. Chaos theory states that the outcome of complex phenomena, such as the social world of human beings, is impossible to predict reliably; 52 and fuzzy logic treats real-world phenomena in a more realistic manner than classical logic with its either/or dichotomy. 53 Even if there is an omniscient deity that could predict the outcome, the human mind would be incapable of that with our level of data processing.…”