Socioscientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded Metacognitive Instructions on Students' Learning Outcomes

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of cooperative training strategies to enhance students' socioscientific decision making as well as their metacognitive skills in the science classroom. Socioscientific decision making refers to both “describing socioscientific issues” as well as “developing and evaluating solutions” to socioscientific issues. We investigated two cooperative training strategies which differed with respect to embedded metacognitive instructions that were developed on the basis of the IMPROVE method. Participants were 360 senior high school students who studied either in a cooperative learning setting (COOP), a cooperative learning setting with embedded metacognitive questions (COOP+META), or a nontreatment control group. Results indicate that students in the two training conditions outperformed students in the control group on both processes of socioscientific decision making. However, students in the COOP+META condition did not outperform students in the COOP condition. With respect to students' learning outcomes on the regulation facet of metacognition, results indicate that all conditions improved over time. Students in the COOP+META condition exhibited highest mean scores at posttest measures, but again, results were not significant. Implications for integrating metacognitive instructions into science classrooms are discussed.

Fostering students’ socioscientific decision-making: exploring the effectiveness of an environmental science competition

“…Our data show no significant effects on students' decision-making due to participation in the BUW. This result contrasts with previous studies that applied the same questionnaire before and after interventions (e.g., Eggert, Ostermeyer, Hasselhorn, & Bögeholz, 2013;Gresch, Hasselhorn, & Bögeholz, 2017). One explanation could be that the questionnaire was commonly implemented before and after short term interventions.…”

Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR)

“…This aspect relates to the “perspective‐taking” dimension of SSR. Eggert, Ostermeyer, Hasselhorn, and Bögeholz () generated a different socio‐scientific decision‐making questionnaire to measure the impact of cooperative and metacognitive learning on high school students’ ability to evaluate SSI and develop solutions to SSI. Most recently, Sakschewski, Eggert, Schneider, and Bögeholz () presented an extension of Eggert and Bögeholz () to decision making around SSI related to energy.…”

Democratization of Learning through Thematic Assignment

“…Thematic learning that to confront the fact around students, and conducted outside the classroom, can build a democracy that ultimately contribute to student learning of knowledge, skills and affection of the problems experienced in everyday life. Democratic learning process experienced by students, to encourage the students to study the social implications of science processes, such research by Eggert et al, (2013). Thematic assignment that confronts students with authentic problems, to build student's initiatives in developing the science process as observing and discussing science.…”