Sociotechnical landscapes in optics of semiotic-digital complexity

Arshinov, Vladimir I.; Budanov, V. G.

doi:10.21146/0042-8744-2020-8-106-116

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Диалектические процессы, проблематика части и целого, эмерджентность и многое другое -все это олицетворяет «парадигму сложностности» Э. Морена [21]. Более того, В. Г. Буданов и А. И. Аршинов отмечают экспоненциальный рост сложностности, который «требует переосмысления традиционных моделей общества и природы, их рассмотрения как взаимодействующих, взаимопроникающих коэволюционирующих подсистем некоего динамически эволюционирующего системносетевого целого» [22]. Это представление отчасти наводит нас на размышления о социотехническом ландшафте цифровой реальности, когда традиционные подхо-ды и модели транспонируются под действием научно-технических процессов, приобретая статус цифровых, отсюда цифровая культура, цифровая экономика, цифровая медицина, цифровое образование и, наконец, цифровое общество [16].…”

Section: результаты и их обсуждениеunclassified

“…Возвращаясь к пониманию наблюдателя сложностности, стоит отметить тот факт, что он как бы становится темпоральным наблюдателем эмерджентного процесса возникновения новых качеств эволюции человека и условий обитания человеческой цивилизации, а также нового качества (типа) общества в целом. Отметим также, что наблюдатель сложностности должен обладать специфическим «сложностным мышлением» по К. Майнцеру [24], характеризующимся принципом рекурсивности: циркулярное движение от частей к целому и обратно; процесс, в котором возникают новые смыслы и качества [22]. Таким образом, общество живет не в условиях природы, а в новой природеприроде цифр, больших данных.…”

Section: результаты и их обсуждениеunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science

Mayakova

2024

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relevance. Quality problems have been relevant for many centuries. At the same time, quality is viewed from the perspective of various sciences and industries indirectly: as a category identified with any sphere. Quality management is also of interest to many scientists and specialists, but most often in the technical or economic sphere. At the same time, its social aspect is obvious. Moreover, in the context of social management (social) quality management is an effective tool aimed at ensuring and improving the quality of life. However, despite the widespread application and adaptation of (social) quality management in various fields of science and practice, philosophical understanding is presented quite selectively. In this regard, in this study, it is advisable to present social quality management from the perspective of philosophy and methodology of science.Purpose. In the work, the author sets himself the purpose of conducting a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Objectives. To achieve this goal, it is relevant to solve the following tasks: analysis of social quality management as a post-non-classical concept of the philosophy of complexity; assessment and interpretation of social quality management in a broad plane of humanitarianism; attempt to define the philosophical understanding of social quality management.Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses in his work such methods and methodologies as the theory of complexity (complexity), the semiotic-digital dimension, and the methodology for constructing sociotechnical landscapes of digital reality. Results. The paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, the author's understanding of social quality management in a philosophical and methodological context is substantiated; social quality management is presented as a concept of the complexity paradigm; the interrelationships of social quality management and the sociotechnical landscape of digital reality in a single field of modern humanities are established.

show abstract

Section: результаты и их обсуждениеunclassified

Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science

Mayakova

2024

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Rebooting social reality in the space of quantified symbolic objects: “ontologization of the figure”

Ignatyev

2023

Obŝestvennye nauki i sovremennostʹ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines one side of the process of ontologization - the transformation of the symbolic world into a world of empirically detectable things and phenomena. The rationale for the thesis is that in the process of digitalization a fragment of being is replaced by its symbol, and the ontologization of “figure” appears as the emanation of the symbol in a fundamentally new fragment of existence, in the embodied semblance of a sign. This process is to be interpreted as “ontologization of the figure” - the transfer of the properties of a symbolic object (constructed as a digital quantified object and including only quantitative characteristics) into a new fragment of reality, which acquires the quality of being exclusively calculated. The conclusion is that the “figure” as an abstraction and phenomenon of consciousness can move from the ideal to the material state and begin its own existence through inclusion into human activity as a symbolic tool of practice, having a dominant effect on the material-subject world and on human behavior. The ontologization of “figure” culminates in the recoding of the properties of real objects and properties of human bodies with physical and psycho-physiological properties into their alternative abstract digital counterparts.

show abstract

Sociotechnical landscapes in optics of semiotic-digital complexity

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science

Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science

Rebooting social reality in the space of quantified symbolic objects: “ontologization of the figure”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About