1968
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(68)90424-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium excretion patterns during and following intravenous sodium chloride loads in normal and hypertensive pregnancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These experiments extend observations concerning the natriuretic response to volume expansion of pregnant women (20)(21)(22)(23), as the changes in V%, CH20%, and Curea/Cinulin suggest that during hypotonic saline loading of lateral recumbent subjects, fractional sodium reabsorption decreased in the proximal nephron. This study also underscores the importance of posture as a determinant of sodium excretion in late pregnancy, for supine recumbency was antinatriuretic despite considerable volume loading.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These experiments extend observations concerning the natriuretic response to volume expansion of pregnant women (20)(21)(22)(23), as the changes in V%, CH20%, and Curea/Cinulin suggest that during hypotonic saline loading of lateral recumbent subjects, fractional sodium reabsorption decreased in the proximal nephron. This study also underscores the importance of posture as a determinant of sodium excretion in late pregnancy, for supine recumbency was antinatriuretic despite considerable volume loading.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Experimental evidence in humans shows that salt loading normal gravidas results in excretion of excessive sodium, allowing the gravida to remain in balance [3]. During salt restriction, much sodium is lost before adjustment in sodium intake and output can be made and balance is regained [9]. Similar observations were made in this study using an animal model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%