2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium hyaluronate-functionalized urea-formaldehyde monolithic column for hydrophilic in-tube solid-phase microextraction of melamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsequent development of various operating systems and new sorbent materials improved extraction efficiency, such as sorption capacity and selectivity, and extended the range of applications. Last decade, numerous applications of online in-tube SPME methods have been reported to many types of pharmaceutical and biomedical [86,, food [125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137], and environmental analyses.…”
Section: Optimization Of In-tube Spmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent development of various operating systems and new sorbent materials improved extraction efficiency, such as sorption capacity and selectivity, and extended the range of applications. Last decade, numerous applications of online in-tube SPME methods have been reported to many types of pharmaceutical and biomedical [86,, food [125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137], and environmental analyses.…”
Section: Optimization Of In-tube Spmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is considered as an efficient miniaturization of SPE once it requires smaller amounts of sample, elution solvent, and sorbent material, being applied to a wide variety of analytes and matrices. Positive experiences of their application are described in the literature due to the capacity of miniaturizing of these techniques together with the use of selective materials that presents high sorption efficiency and consequently the reduction of environmental impacts that are caused by conventional extraction techniques .…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an efficient sample preparation technique that generally uses a fused silica capillary, PEEK (poly (ether ether ketone)) or steel tube internally coated with a stationary phase. This technique was developed with the purpose of overcoming the disadvantages of conventional SPME, such as low sorption capacity and high brittleness, having as an advantage the direct extraction of the analytes of interest and the concentration of them in the stationary phase that coats internally the capillary . As a consequence, in‐tube SPME uses a capillary column directly coupled to HPLC (in‐tube SPME‐LC), thus allowing the automation of the extraction process, a greater precision of the analytical method and a shorter time of analysis .…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyte is specifically captured by the extraction phase and then eluted in certain eluent solution for analysis. This innovative approach has been widely used in the analysis of biological, food, and environmental samples . In‐tube solid‐phase microextraction (IT–SPME), a SPME method reported by Pawliszyn and Eisert in 1997, typically uses a fused‐silica capillary to pretreat targeted analytes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%