2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium storage mechanism of N, S co-doped nanoporous carbon: Experimental design and theoretical evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the similar chemical nature of sodium to lithium, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been extensively investigated and regarded as the most promising alternative power technology to the commercialized LIBs, especially for largescale energy storage from intermittent and renewable energy sources and smart grid applications, owing to the low cost and natural abundance of sodium resources. [3][4][5][6] Considerable efforts have been made to apply the successful experience on LIB systems to the SIBs, especially in the terms of the electrode materials. The larger ionic radius (1.02 Å for Na + vs. 0.76 Å for Li + ), resulting in sluggish reaction kinetics, usually causes lower capacity, inferior rate capability, poor cycling stability, or even complete electrochemical inactivity, as in the case of graphitic carbon, the most commonly used anode material in LIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the similar chemical nature of sodium to lithium, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been extensively investigated and regarded as the most promising alternative power technology to the commercialized LIBs, especially for largescale energy storage from intermittent and renewable energy sources and smart grid applications, owing to the low cost and natural abundance of sodium resources. [3][4][5][6] Considerable efforts have been made to apply the successful experience on LIB systems to the SIBs, especially in the terms of the electrode materials. The larger ionic radius (1.02 Å for Na + vs. 0.76 Å for Li + ), resulting in sluggish reaction kinetics, usually causes lower capacity, inferior rate capability, poor cycling stability, or even complete electrochemical inactivity, as in the case of graphitic carbon, the most commonly used anode material in LIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excellent sodium storage behavior of N 0.2 S 0.8 ‐MC anode is mainly attributed to microdominant porous structure, the defects/disorders introduced by chemical doping, and the expanding interlayer distance caused by the N, S codoping. The former ensures the structure foundation, which builds an ideal bridge between the active electrode and electrolyte, and the latter contributes the component foundation, which enhances the sodium insertion/extraction and leading to a high capacity …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the ultra-small Sn QDs can increase the specific active surface with electrolyte, enhancing the interfacial Na + storage properties and improving capacity [20,50]. On the other hand, the optimized N,S co-doped CNFs can induce numerous extrinsic defects and active sites, which can further enhance the sodium absorption properties [35]. In comparison, the Sn/N-CNFs, Sn/NS-CNFs, and Sn/N-CNFs@rGO electrodes deliver a relatively lower (1) 4Sn + 15Na + ↔ Na 15 Sn 4 (2) xC + Na + + e − ↔ NaC x capacity of 201, 300, and 410 mAh g −1 after 200 cycles at 100 mA g −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%