Proceedings of ISRE '97: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering 1997
DOI: 10.1109/isre.1997.566840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOFL: a formal engineering methodology for industrial applications

Abstract: Formal methods have yet to achieve wide industrial acceptance for several reasons. They are not well integrated into established industrial software processes, their application requires signicant abstraction and mathematical skills, and existing tools do not satisfactorily support the entire formal software development process.We h a ve proposed a language called SOFL (Structured-Object-based-Formal Language) and a SOFL methodology for system development that attempts to address these problems using an integr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we use Z notation to describe the PDFD, the following given types are needed, their semantics can be found in Ref. [ 3 ].…”
Section: Basic Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When we use Z notation to describe the PDFD, the following given types are needed, their semantics can be found in Ref. [ 3 ].…”
Section: Basic Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it seems still difficult to improve this situation in the industrial settings, because there is no better choice for practitioners. Although many formal notations, such as Z [48] , VDM-SL [7], LOTOS [8], OBJ [9], and Larch 11°], are available in the literature, they are seldom used in large-scale software development projects, for formal specifications are not easy to write and read by practitioners due to various reasons ( e. g., highly abstract mathematical expressions, practical constraints) [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%