2021
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202170257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft‐Contact Acoustic Microgripper Based on a Controllable Gas–Liquid Interface for Biomicromanipulations (Small 49/2021)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microgrippers are small micro/millimeter-sized robotic devices that can grasp micro-objects in a narrow and confined environment with accuracy that may not be achieved using manual operations. [1] Further, the controllability and adaptivity of the untethered designs of this device facilitated them as a promising tool for several applications such as particle manipulation [2][3][4] and micro-assembly. [5][6][7] Meanwhile, a strong emphasis has been provided on understanding different aspects of the microgrippers, DOI: 10.1002/admt.202400292 including the design, [8] fabrication, [9] and assembly [10] that can ease the overall challenges, such as complex structures, amplified stiffness, slow response time, and limited manipulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Microgrippers are small micro/millimeter-sized robotic devices that can grasp micro-objects in a narrow and confined environment with accuracy that may not be achieved using manual operations. [1] Further, the controllability and adaptivity of the untethered designs of this device facilitated them as a promising tool for several applications such as particle manipulation [2][3][4] and micro-assembly. [5][6][7] Meanwhile, a strong emphasis has been provided on understanding different aspects of the microgrippers, DOI: 10.1002/admt.202400292 including the design, [8] fabrication, [9] and assembly [10] that can ease the overall challenges, such as complex structures, amplified stiffness, slow response time, and limited manipulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, ultrasound is an attractive modality to manipulate micro-objects with distinct advantages of biocompatibility, deeper penetration, no requirement for special sample properties (conductivity, transparency, and more), and the ability to generate large forces. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Currently, ultrasounddriven manipulation, in terms of trapping and rotating, has been achieved for microbeads, [39][40][41][42][43] cells, [44][45][46][47][48][49][50] and plant seeds, 51,52 by using surface acoustic waves and microbubbles. However, most of these subjects have nearly spherical structures with good symmetry and are ∼5-100 μm in size; only a few work to date has been conducted on model organisms with slender bodies like C. elegans (∼600-1000 μm) 53,54 and zebrafish (∼1-5 mm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%