2023
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2022.3231360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Robots Modeling: A Structured Overview

Abstract: The robotics community has seen an exponential growth in the level of complexity of the theoretical tools presented for the modeling of soft robotics devices. Different solutions have been presented to overcome the difficulties related to the modeling of soft robots, often leveraging on other scientific disciplines, such as continuum mechanics, computational mechanics, and computer graphics. These theoretical and computational foundations are often taken for granted and this leads to an intricate literature th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For detailed review of learning-based methods, the reader can refer to recent articles on modeling and control. [26][27][28][29][30][31] 4. Sensing, Control, and Planning…”
Section: Learning-based (Model-less) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For detailed review of learning-based methods, the reader can refer to recent articles on modeling and control. [26][27][28][29][30][31] 4. Sensing, Control, and Planning…”
Section: Learning-based (Model-less) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent surveys have proposed compelling categorizations, mostly based on system kinematics, to classify relevant modeling techniques. [26,29] In this survey, we adapt a systematic approach based on the standard convention in classic continuum mechanics research, thus classifying methods according to the following: 1) Kinematics, which define the robot configuration with either absolute [96][97][98] or relative [99] coordinate frames. Absolute models refer to a fixed inertial frame, whereas relative models define the configuration in relative frames that depend on the robot's motion.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical computation of this value depends on the mechanical model used to describe the body of the continuum robot. A geometrically exact solution can be obtained by defining the robot body as a beam through Euler–Bernoulli, Kirchhoff, or Cosserat beam theories [ 39 , 40 ]. For each segment with length of the robot backbone, independently from the robot design, a local stiffness coefficient can be then evaluated through material properties (such as Young’s modulus ) and geometry (such as second moment of area ) when material mechanics are linear or can be linearized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, traditional modeling and control methods that assume rigid links are not directly applicable [3]. These challenges led to the development of alternative modeling [4] and control strategies [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%