“…The rejection of a feminised view of ECS, as signified by a mean of 3.94 on Feminisation (SLI 10), may be an indirect signal of the progress being made against the historical construction of Engineering as a masculine profession, consisting in what is known as "hard skills", whose characterisation has been recognised as the main factor in the underrepresentation of women in STEM disciplines and professions (Phipps, 2002as cited in Du Toit & Roodt, 2009, and which negates the social value of gender equality. Instead of a technical distinction, Hong (2016: 3) characterises the division between soft skills and hard skills as a gendered division, whereby "soft skills" is directed into an alignment with femininity, and "hard skills" with masculinity, and then followed by the devaluing of the "feminine skills" by tending to associate them with less prestige, lack of intellectual rigour, and only with the Humanities, as a trope of devalued knowledge. Undoing the diachronic and synchronic effects of sexism and elitism is, as highlighted in the prescribed book by Ingre (2008: 5-6), an important goal in Engineering education and professional practice.…”