2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft.2018.8404917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft skin texture modulation for social robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New methods are also emerging for the construction of physical robots. Rapid fabrication methods, such as 3D printing, have led to the development of new robot morphologies, including 3D printable robots inspired by "origami" [Onal et al 2014] and robots with soft skin that can change appearance and texture to communicate internal states to the user [Hu et al 2018]. Mixed-reality technologies are also being utilized to facilitate human interaction with robots, including displaying cues that communicate the motion intent and and the field of view ] of the robot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New methods are also emerging for the construction of physical robots. Rapid fabrication methods, such as 3D printing, have led to the development of new robot morphologies, including 3D printable robots inspired by "origami" [Onal et al 2014] and robots with soft skin that can change appearance and texture to communicate internal states to the user [Hu et al 2018]. Mixed-reality technologies are also being utilized to facilitate human interaction with robots, including displaying cues that communicate the motion intent and and the field of view ] of the robot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft robots can be defined as systems that are capable of autonomous behavior and primarily composed of materials with elastic moduli in the range of that of soft biological materials (Rus and Tolley, 2015). Soft robots are claimed to offer inherently safer interactions with humans (Laschi et al, 2016), yet only a few publications have addressed how humans experience soft robots and how intuitive and engaging human interaction with them might be designed (Jørgensen, 2017a;Zheng, 2017;Boer and Bewley, 2018;Hu et al, 2018;Jørgensen, 2018;Shutterly et al, 2018;Zheng, 2018;Milthers et al, 2019;Jørgensen and Ploetz, 2020;Jørgensen et al, 2021;Zheng and Walker, 2019). Soft robotics technology has recently made its way into art, design, and architecture projects (Jørgensen, 2017b;Jørgensen, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional transformations could enrich the capability of swarm user interfaces. For example, each robot could change its texture to communicate its internal state, similar to [15]. Another interesting aspect of shape-changing swarms is the potential to simultaneously achieve both topologically equivalent (e.g., form, volume) and non-topologically equivalent shapes (e.g., adding/subtracting, permeability) by combining individual and collective shape transformations.…”
Section: Types Of Shape Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%