2017
DOI: 10.1364/oe.25.029328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft-tissue differentiation and bone densitometry via energy-discriminating X-ray microCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while methods like K-edge subtraction are no longer applicable, measurement of relative attenuation changes over the energy range enables segmentation of poorly contrasting materials, which otherwise cannot be differentiated in conventional X-ray CT 16 . Previous work on bone densitometry and soft tissue segmentation has been shown to be possible with few channel spectroscopic imaging, without the need for contrast agents 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while methods like K-edge subtraction are no longer applicable, measurement of relative attenuation changes over the energy range enables segmentation of poorly contrasting materials, which otherwise cannot be differentiated in conventional X-ray CT 16 . Previous work on bone densitometry and soft tissue segmentation has been shown to be possible with few channel spectroscopic imaging, without the need for contrast agents 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent development in technology has made it possible for spatially resolved detectors, such as Pilatus [ 21 ] or Pixirad, [ 44,45 ] to count only incoming photons with energies higher than a threshold level set by users. Applications of our technique to imaging work using these detectors promise great potentials in quantitative elemental contrast imaging and will also be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I 0 is the incident intensity. For low-density materials, such as soft tissue, the X-ray attenuation generates only relatively low contrast [22]. By comparison, in the hard X-ray regime, the phase shift is typically three orders of magnitude larger than the corresponding absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%