2002
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.119573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did not come up with a significant difference between the genders and they did not make any measurements related to facial tissue thickness. [23] In another study performed in accordance with Holdaway analysis norms by Erbay et al, it was found that the value for the lower lip was similar to the standard proposed by Holdaway, whereas the values for the nasal prominence and the H angle were greater than Holdaway's norms. [23] Basçiftçi et al measured 175 individuals to determine Holdaway soft tissue norms on Turkish adults of Anatolian origins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they did not come up with a significant difference between the genders and they did not make any measurements related to facial tissue thickness. [23] In another study performed in accordance with Holdaway analysis norms by Erbay et al, it was found that the value for the lower lip was similar to the standard proposed by Holdaway, whereas the values for the nasal prominence and the H angle were greater than Holdaway's norms. [23] Basçiftçi et al measured 175 individuals to determine Holdaway soft tissue norms on Turkish adults of Anatolian origins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…[15][16][17] Values pertaining to the Turkish population are limited to the dentistry literature and existing studies have been conducted to find out the norm values of specific orthodontic analyses. [18][19][20][23][24][25] In one of these studies, Erbay et al used various linear lines and angles on Turkish adult subjects with Anatolian origins who pertained to Class I group. They measured the distance between the soft tissue parts of the upper and lower lips and these lines and compared measurements for males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of vertical facial proportion on perception of facial attractiveness has also been investigated by several studies [26][27][28] with varied findings. Some studies have reported that a reduced lower facial proportion was more acceptable than an increased lower facial proportion, but there are also studies that have demonstrated otherwise.…”
Section: Influence Of Soft-tissue Cephalometric Variables On Subjectimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Türk halk› için az say›da sefalometrik analiz sonuçlar› bildirilmifl olmas›na ra¤men (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) daha önceden florozisli bireylerde adolesan ve genç eriflkinlere ait herhangi bir sefalometrik büyüme çal›flmas› yap›lmam›fl-t›r. Bundan dolay› çal›flmam›z›n amac› 12±1 ve 21±1 yafl gruplar›ndaki florozisli Türk bireylerinde bafl ve yüz de¤iflimini, lateral sefalometriler üzerinde Björk yüz geliflim analizini (15) kullanarak göstermektir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified