2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-009-0776-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue sarcomas with non-EWS translocations: molecular genetic features and pathologic and clinical correlations

Abstract: Many soft tissue sarcoma subtypes have consistent chromosomal translocations with novel fusion genes, which result in disordered cellular function. The microscopic appearances, immunophenotype and behaviour of such tumours relate to the genetic events to a variable extent. This paper reviews the molecular pathology and related morphological and clinical features of sarcomas with non-EWS translocations. These include synovial sarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
2
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, FISH and RT-PCR showed a similar specificity (100%), but FISH was more sensitive than RT-PCR (91% vs. 72%; P ¼ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and NPVs for each of the two testing methods are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 (Fisher, 2010). In some instances, these techniques can also help to identify cases suitable for specific therapies (Jain et al, 2010).…”
Section: Comparison Between Rt-pcr and Fish Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, FISH and RT-PCR showed a similar specificity (100%), but FISH was more sensitive than RT-PCR (91% vs. 72%; P ¼ 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and NPVs for each of the two testing methods are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 (Fisher, 2010). In some instances, these techniques can also help to identify cases suitable for specific therapies (Jain et al, 2010).…”
Section: Comparison Between Rt-pcr and Fish Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In either type of synovial sarcomas, epithelial markers, such as EMA and cytokeratin, may be reactive, however the golden diagnostic tool in about 90% of cases is the t(X;18) (p11;q11) translocation [12]. This is a rearrangement of the SS18 gene (formerly known as SYT) in the 18q11 region and one of the SSX1, SSX2, or SSX4 genes in Xp11 [13]. Currently, surgical excision is the main treatment modality for SS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, surgical excision is the main treatment modality for SS. Radiotherapy decreases the rate of local recurrence and adjuvant chemotherapy shown to increase time to local or distal recurrence, but not necessarily improve overall survival [13]. Spillane et al [14], studied 150 cases of synovial sarcoma which showed a 5 year survival rate of 57%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its name, it is neither related to nor does it arise from synovial cells. Microscopically, biphasic, monophasic spindle cell, poorly differentiated, calcifying/ossifying and myxoid subtypes have been described [13]. Immunohistochemistry is particularly useful in the diagnosis of the monophasic spindle cell variant, which is more difficult to distinguish from other spindle cell sarcomas on morphologic grounds alone.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistry In Diagnosis and Prognosis Of Softmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcomas with non-EWS translocations are spindle, polygonal or small round cell tumours with varying behaviour, which mostly occur in children or young adults. They include synovial sarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, infantile fibrosarcoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour [13].…”
Section: Molecular Pathology Of Sts Molecular Genetics Of Sts Hasmentioning
confidence: 99%