2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softening behavior of reinforced concrete beams under cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although damage is inherently a non isotropic phenomenon, in order to overcome some of the dramatic convergence problems related to the computational implementations, many authors have commonly adopted an isotropic damage formulation, making use of a single scalar variable (Luccioni et al, 1996;Jirásek and Zimmermann, 1998;Brenchic and Gambarotta, 2001;Salari et al, 2004). Scalar models with two damage variables have also been proposed, in an attempt to distinguish between tension and compression damage mechanisms (Mazars, 1986;Faria et al, 1998;Comi and Perego, 2001;Marfia et al, 2004). Following the general formulation of Hansen and Schreyer (1994) and Murakami and Kamiya (1997), anisotropic damage models have been proposed introducing 4th or more frequently 2nd order tensors (Papa and Taliercio, 1996;Dragon et al, 2000;Sellier and Bary, 2002;Litewka and Debinski, 2003;Lü et al, 2004;Kuna-Ciskał and Skrzypek, 2004;Gambarotta, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although damage is inherently a non isotropic phenomenon, in order to overcome some of the dramatic convergence problems related to the computational implementations, many authors have commonly adopted an isotropic damage formulation, making use of a single scalar variable (Luccioni et al, 1996;Jirásek and Zimmermann, 1998;Brenchic and Gambarotta, 2001;Salari et al, 2004). Scalar models with two damage variables have also been proposed, in an attempt to distinguish between tension and compression damage mechanisms (Mazars, 1986;Faria et al, 1998;Comi and Perego, 2001;Marfia et al, 2004). Following the general formulation of Hansen and Schreyer (1994) and Murakami and Kamiya (1997), anisotropic damage models have been proposed introducing 4th or more frequently 2nd order tensors (Papa and Taliercio, 1996;Dragon et al, 2000;Sellier and Bary, 2002;Litewka and Debinski, 2003;Lü et al, 2004;Kuna-Ciskał and Skrzypek, 2004;Gambarotta, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuna-Ciska and Skrzypek (2004) studied the anisotropic evolution of damage factors for elastic-brittle materials based on the theory of continuum damage mechanics (CDM) and the finite element method (FEM). Marfia et al (2004) analyzed the change in damage factors for reinforced concrete in the process of compressive and tensile softening. Mirzabozorg and Ghaemian (2005) proposed a damage constitutive model to describe the behavior of concrete under static and dynamic loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following quoted papers belong to such different approaches and are listed just in order of their appearance to witness the great, constant and actual interest on concrete modelling. Bažant and Gambarova [6]; Rots and de Borst [62]; Simo and Ju [63]; Meschke et al [47]; Lubliner et al [37]; Bielger and Mehrabadi [9]; Lee and Feuves [33]; Addessi et al [1]; Jirásek and Bažant [30]; Marfia et al [40]; Grassl and Jirásek [27]; Voyiadjis et al [66]; Contraffatto and Cuomo [19]; Jason et al [29]; Mohamed-Hussein and Shao [48]; Cicekli et al [18]; Mattei et al [42]; Č ervenka and Papanikolaou [15]; Vrech and Etse [67]; Yu et al [70]; Dede and Ayvaz [20]; Li and Crouch [34]; Zhang et al [71]; Cerioni et al [14]; Marmo et al [41]; Brisotto et al [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%