1986
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198606000-00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softening of Canine Articular Cartilage After Immobilization of the Knee Joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
80
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have shown that mechanical loading of articular cartilage affects the metabolism of chondrocytes and its biochemical composition [1,32,37]. Both animal and human studies have shown that the GAG content is higher in cartilage that is habitually loaded [19,33] or has a higher level of activity [39], whereas immobilization results in a reversible decrease in cartilage PG content [18,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that mechanical loading of articular cartilage affects the metabolism of chondrocytes and its biochemical composition [1,32,37]. Both animal and human studies have shown that the GAG content is higher in cartilage that is habitually loaded [19,33] or has a higher level of activity [39], whereas immobilization results in a reversible decrease in cartilage PG content [18,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of these animal studies have been highly variable and inconsistent. Jurvelin et al (2), for example, observed a 9% decrease in cartilage thickness in the canine knee after 11 weeks of rigid immobilization. Haapala et al (3) reported a large decrease (ϳ20%) in cartilage of the medial femur, but no changes in cartilage of the lateral tibia and lateral femur (4), of canine knee joints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There have been many reports of articular cartilage degeneration after immobilization (Evans et al 1960;Thaxter et al 1965;Jurvelin et al 1986;Behrens et al 1989;Setton et al 1997). Because the method of immobilization and evaluated areas were quite different from study to study, the events that occurred in the joint after immobilization have not been clarified (Haapala et al 1999;Trudel et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These severe changes of the articular cartilage may depend on a method of immobilization. Immobilization methods are divided into "non-rigid fixation" using sling, plaster (Roy 1970;Jurvelin et al 1986;Haapala et al 1999) and wire (Akeson et al 1967) or "rigid fixation" using an internal or external fixator (Evans et al 1960;Thaxter et al 1965;Behrens et al 1989). Behrens et al compared degenerative changes of the articular cartilage by cast and external fixator in the canine immobilized knee model, and revealed the changes were more severe in the external fixator group than in the cast group (Behrens et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%