1995
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00059-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softening of concrete in compression — Localization and size effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intermediate scenarios can occur for different degrees of friction and slenderness; they are characterized mainly by inclined shear band zone. Regarding damage localization under compression, experimental observation by [Kotsovos 1983; Van Mier 1984; Jansen, Shah 1997] showed strain localization; analytical investigation by [Markeset, Hillerborg 1995] showed that the concept of fracture energy in tension holds true for compression. This gives the evidence to use the fracture energy-based regularization in describing the softening of concrete under compression [Van Mier 2013].…”
Section: Mesh-insensitivity Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermediate scenarios can occur for different degrees of friction and slenderness; they are characterized mainly by inclined shear band zone. Regarding damage localization under compression, experimental observation by [Kotsovos 1983; Van Mier 1984; Jansen, Shah 1997] showed strain localization; analytical investigation by [Markeset, Hillerborg 1995] showed that the concept of fracture energy in tension holds true for compression. This gives the evidence to use the fracture energy-based regularization in describing the softening of concrete under compression [Van Mier 2013].…”
Section: Mesh-insensitivity Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This height represents the lower portion of the confined boundary in a wall where likely compressive failure may occur. Observations from previous experimental studies indicate that the compressive failure region is quite limited within a height of about 2.5 times the wall thickness (Markeset and Hillerborg 1995;Takahashi et al 2013). The elements were cast vertically in two stages, the lower stub was cast first and then the element and the upper stub as one part with intentionally roughened surface created at lower stub-element interface to insure adherence.…”
Section: Description Of the Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Two remaining consistent tangent stiffness matrix elements qdr 1 qe 2 and qdr 1 qe 3 of the differential stress increment dr 1 are:…”
Section: Consistent Tangent Stiffness Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%