2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softening-precipitation interaction in a Nb-and N-bearing austenitic stainless steel under stress relaxation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous experiments, it has been shown that when the initial stress of the prestressed steel wire was less than 0.5 times the value of the ultimate tensile strength Ry, the influence of the relaxation of the steel wire could be ignored [37][38][39][40][41][42]. The maximum initial prestress applied to the steel wire in this test was 0.3Ry (0.3Ry < 0.5Ry).…”
Section: Stress Variation Law Of Prestressed Steel Wirementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Based on the previous experiments, it has been shown that when the initial stress of the prestressed steel wire was less than 0.5 times the value of the ultimate tensile strength Ry, the influence of the relaxation of the steel wire could be ignored [37][38][39][40][41][42]. The maximum initial prestress applied to the steel wire in this test was 0.3Ry (0.3Ry < 0.5Ry).…”
Section: Stress Variation Law Of Prestressed Steel Wirementioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this test, the stress variation of the steel bars was caused by two factors, one was the relaxation of the steel bars, and the other was the creep characteristic of the glulam. Previous studies showed that the relaxation of the steel bars was not significant anymore when the initial stress of the prestressed steel bars was less than 0.5 times value of the ultimate tensile strength R y [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Since the maximum prestress applied in this study was 60 MPa < 0.5fu = 270 MPa, the stress variation caused by the relaxation of the steel bars was ignored, and it was considered that the stress variation of the steel bars was mainly caused by the creep of the glulam.…”
Section: Stress Variation Of Steel Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor to keep in mind is the influence of solute supersaturation, since the steel was kept at the soaking temperature of 1250 • C for 300 s, and Nb and N supersaturation in the austenite increases with decreasing temperature. Strain-induced precipitation is known to occur due to such supersaturation, which increases the nucleation rate and accelerates precipitation kinetics, and the higher this precipitation the greater its influence on SRX [45]. The supersaturation of Nb in the austenite of this steel at T ≤ 1050 • C is higher than at T ≤ 1100 • C. Thus, precipitation at higher temperatures may be too slow, t p > 400 s, to inhibit SRX, which is not the case at lower temperatures.…”
Section: Microstructural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%