1998
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x98000184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softly Broken N=2 QCD With Massive Quark Hypermultiplets, I

Abstract: We present a general analysis of all possible soft breakings of N = 2 supersymmetric QCD preserving the analytic properties of the Seiberg-Witten solutions for the SU(2) group with N f = 1, 2, 3 hypermultiplets. We obtain all the couplings of the spurion fields in terms of properties of the SeibergWitten periods, which we express in terms of elementary elliptic functions by uniformizing the elliptic curves associated to each number of flavors. We analyze in detail the monodromy properties of the softly broken … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 One thus finds for the number of vacua 12) which is indeed the correct vacuum multiplicity in this case (Eq. (3.23)).…”
Section: Su(n C )mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…11 One thus finds for the number of vacua 12) which is indeed the correct vacuum multiplicity in this case (Eq. (3.23)).…”
Section: Su(n C )mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the physics literature, these additional fields are called massless monopoles, and their number is denoted by 2N f , where 0 Ä N f Ä 4. The case where N f D 0 corresponds to the original SO.3/-Donaldson invariants 1 . The corresponding moduli spaces and invariants when N f > 0 have not been given much consideration in mathematics.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may notice that the differentials λ 2nv Dn do not look like those obtained in [6,34,23]. Our next task is to show that they are indeed derived from the N f = 4 SW differentials in spinors of SO (8) and their residues transform in the spinor representation of SO(2N f ) with N f ≤ 3.…”
Section: Spinor Representationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since 34) one has to take care of the total derivative term in ∂λ 8v /∂z (see (A.15)) when converting…”
Section: The D 4 Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%