Software-based energy profiling of Android apps: Simple, efficient and reliable?

Abstract

Modeling the power profile of mobile applications is a crucial activity to identify the causes behind energy leaks. To this aim, researchers have proposed hardware-based tools as well as model-based and software-based techniques to approximate the actual energy profile. However, all these solutions present their own advantages and disadvantages. Hardware-based tools are highly precise, but at the same time their use is bound to the acquisition of costly hardware components. Model-based tools require the calibration of parameters needed to correctly create a model on a specific hardware device. Software-based approaches do not need any hardware components, but they rely on battery measurements and, thus, they are hardware-assisted. These tools are cheaper and easier to use than hardware-based tools, but they are believed to be less precise. In this paper, we take a deeper look at the pros and cons of software-based solutions investigating to what extent their measurements depart from hardware-based solutions. To this aim, we propose a software-based tool named PETRA that we compare with the hardware-based MONSOON toolkit on 54 Android apps. The results show that PETRA performs similarly to MONSOON despite not using any sophisticated hardware components. In fact, in all the apps the mean relative error with respect to MONSOON is lower than 0.05. Moreover, for 95% of the analyzed methods the estimation error is within 5% of the actual values measured using the hardware-based toolkit

On the Energy Footprint of Mobile Testing Frameworks

“…We have adopted a hardware-based approach to obtain energy measurements. We use Monsoon's Original Power Monitor with the sample rate set to 5000Hz, as used in previous research [10], [11], [28], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Measurements are obtained using the Physalia toolset 6 Python library to collect energy consumption measurements in Android devices.…”

“…Notifications and alarms were turned off, lock screen security was disabled, and the "Don't keep Activities" setting was enabled. This last setting destroys every activity as soon as the user leaves it, erasing the current state of an app 11 .…”

An Energy Efficiency Study of Web-Based Communication in Android Phones

“…To measure energy consumption of software applications running on mobile phones, there are multiple tools based on both hardware and software [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Although hardware measurement offers higher precision, we cannot make use of it, since it estimates the energy consumed by the whole machine, and our study investigates the consumption at the application level.…”

A Novel Easy-to-construct Power Model for Embedded and Mobile Systems - Using Recursive Neural Nets to Estimate Power Consumption of ARM-based Embedded Systems and Mobile Devices

“…More recently, several new models were also published, either for the system as a whole, as it was the case for (Di Nucci et al, 2017a), (Shukla et al, 2016) and (Chowdhury and Hindle, 2016), or just the Central Processing Unit (CPU) like the models presented in (Yoon et al, 2017) and (Walker et al, 2017). Some of them even offered better accuracy like (Yoon et al, 2017) and proved that software profiling is practically as accurate and reliable as hardware profiling (Di Nucci et al, 2017b).…”