2006
DOI: 10.1002/spe.711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software experience when using ontologies in a multi‐agent system for automated planning and scheduling

Abstract: The main aim of this paper is to present the software experience when using multi‐agent systems (MASs) and ontologies in the development of a sample application. In particular, the authors have implemented a MAS for the planning and scheduling of a University Research Group. This MAS, called MASplan, should help group members to find the best possible time frames to hold a meeting and to designate the use of common resources. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ABMS, knowledge is usually simplified and modelled as set of properties and values or as a state-machine [122,123]. More complex knowledge representations have been proposed, mainly from a MAS perspective, for example, using the fuzzy cognitive model in Reference [124] or ontologies in References [125][126][127]. The approach for representing agent's knowledge is tied to the decision-making process.…”
Section: Multi-agent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ABMS, knowledge is usually simplified and modelled as set of properties and values or as a state-machine [122,123]. More complex knowledge representations have been proposed, mainly from a MAS perspective, for example, using the fuzzy cognitive model in Reference [124] or ontologies in References [125][126][127]. The approach for representing agent's knowledge is tied to the decision-making process.…”
Section: Multi-agent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic knowledge structure is constituted by an ontology which is a key feature for achieving flexibility in agent-based control systems [15]. In contrast to multi-agent systems with centralized ontologies [16], each automation agent relies on its own ontology which is derived from a general system ontology. The vocabulary defined by the ontology is then used to express knowledge about the current state of the world in a set of facts.…”
Section: High Level Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have decided to design a coarse-grained ontology [17], due to the relatively simpleness of its use in MASCONTROL. Defined classes are mainly related to control concepts: System, Input, Output, ReferenceInput, Error, ControlAction.…”
Section: Ontology Design Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%