2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software for computerised analysis of cardiotocographic traces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTG signals were processed by software previously developed by the authors [ 7 , 84 ]. Firstly, they were preprocessed by means of a software [ 10 , 84 ] which processes signals in output from the cardiotocographs in order to recognize signal tracts having good and bad quality (these last including tracts of signal loss); for each segment of good quality, recover the real uneven FHR series when CTG output is evenly spaced (case of HP/Philips cardiotocographs) [ 87 ] and detect and process outliers [ 88 ]; interpolate signal tracts of poor quality (according to an index provided by the equipment) or signal loss which last maximum 3 s, in order to avoid an excessive fragmentation of the signal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CTG signals were processed by software previously developed by the authors [ 7 , 84 ]. Firstly, they were preprocessed by means of a software [ 10 , 84 ] which processes signals in output from the cardiotocographs in order to recognize signal tracts having good and bad quality (these last including tracts of signal loss); for each segment of good quality, recover the real uneven FHR series when CTG output is evenly spaced (case of HP/Philips cardiotocographs) [ 87 ] and detect and process outliers [ 88 ]; interpolate signal tracts of poor quality (according to an index provided by the equipment) or signal loss which last maximum 3 s, in order to avoid an excessive fragmentation of the signal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, hence, interest has grown in how to recognize changes in FHR that might predict more accurately foetal distress. For example, in order to overcome the subjective nature of FHR interpretation, several attempts have been made to automate the diagnosis of the foetal status and many computerised algorithms have been developed to assess FHR parameters [ 1 , 6 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since at the time of fetal monitoring, there is no other diagnostic method which could be able to confirm a correctness of the signal classification, the FHR signals, being acquired during pregnancy, are retrospectively assigned to true fetal outcome (newborn state) (Chudacek et al, 2014; Romano et al, 2016a). It is justified, as in obstetrics it is assumed that the normal fetal outcome has to be result of proper fetal development during the pregnancy period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More important was to ensure the trace continuity which allowed clinicians to observe a general tendency of the fetal heart rate changes, and to recognize the features representing longitudinal FHR patterns relating to the fetal state, like acceleration or deceleration. It was found that the evaluation of fetal state, when based on visual interpretation, has been mainly affected by low inter- and intra-observer agreement (Jezewski et al, 2002; Romano et al, 2016a). That was a result of both complexity of the FHR signal and the fact that important part of information relating to instantaneous changes of FHR values has been hidden from a naked eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerised CTG has played a significant role in developing objective measures as a function of CTG signals [14], particularly within the machine learning community [15]- [18], [7], [12], [19]- [23]. According to a Cochrane report in 2015, computerised interpretation of CTG traces significantly reduced perinatal mortality [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%