2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software-in-the-loop optimization of actuator and sensor placement for a smart piezoelectric funnel-shaped inlet of a magnetic resonance imaging tomograph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These afore-mentioned optimization techniques are typically dependent on theoretical models supported by accurate state-space equations to evaluate system measures such as Bruant and Proslier [18], H 2 /H ∞ norms [19,20] (openloop methods), or system responses under given control laws [21,22] (closed-loop methods) to construct optimization criteria representing system vibrations. Although these methods are effective in optimizing actuator/sensor configurations, they share a common limitation: relying on accurate parametric models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These afore-mentioned optimization techniques are typically dependent on theoretical models supported by accurate state-space equations to evaluate system measures such as Bruant and Proslier [18], H 2 /H ∞ norms [19,20] (openloop methods), or system responses under given control laws [21,22] (closed-loop methods) to construct optimization criteria representing system vibrations. Although these methods are effective in optimizing actuator/sensor configurations, they share a common limitation: relying on accurate parametric models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By evaluating the placement index of candidate positions across the entire surface of the structure, the SIL testing method with recursive communication between numerical simulation FE software and Python-designed optimization tool can be achieved in every optimization iteration. 15 To evaluate the superiority and inferiority of the container receiving algorithm and promote the optimization of intelligent algorithms, calculation is carried out through the construction of a hierarchical generalized network driving model and a container receiving evaluation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kevin Hassw and Atta Oveisi proposed an optimization program for piezoelectric structures based on surface optimization method, which combines software‐in‐the‐loop (SIL) testing approach and balanced modal reduction, and uses norms in the placement index. By evaluating the placement index of candidate positions across the entire surface of the structure, the SIL testing method with recursive communication between numerical simulation FE software and Python‐designed optimization tool can be achieved in every optimization iteration 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the above literature review, many optimization criteria have been proposed so far [14]. Among those optimization criteria, the most commonly used criterion is the maximization of controllability/observability and the minimization of control spillover as proposed by Hac and Liu [15], because this criterion is based on the inherent dynamic properties of the structure, and the optimal results can be less sensitive to a change of control strategy [16,17]. However, this criterion usually cannot distribute the control efficiencies of multimode averagely, thus leading to multi-mode peaks' reductions unevenly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%