2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.07571
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software must be recognised as an important output of scholarly research

Caroline Jay,
Robert Haines,
Daniel S. Katz

Abstract: Software now lies at the heart of scholarly research. Here we argue that as well as being important from a methodological perspective, software should, in many instances, be recognised as an output of research, equivalent to an academic paper. The article discusses the different roles that software may play in research and highlights the relationship between software and research sustainability and reproducibility. It describes the challenges associated with the processes of citing and reviewing software, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Software is a critical component of science, and reproducibility [10,17,18], and scholarly articles are increasingly referencing Jupyter Notebooks with code segments and visualizations. However, it is very cumbersome if not impossible to reproduce the published bundle of notebooks and associated code and data.…”
Section: Use Cases For Portable and Reproducible Notebooks 21 Reprodu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software is a critical component of science, and reproducibility [10,17,18], and scholarly articles are increasingly referencing Jupyter Notebooks with code segments and visualizations. However, it is very cumbersome if not impossible to reproduce the published bundle of notebooks and associated code and data.…”
Section: Use Cases For Portable and Reproducible Notebooks 21 Reprodu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates a barrier of entry in many research tasks and makes it difficult to do iterative research. In other words, this problem makes it difficult for the software to support the provenance of reported results [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%