2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30246-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Quality Standards and Models Evolution: Greenness and Reliability Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software quality community cannot refer to a unique set of concepts and associated meanings when assessing the software quality domain or when introducing a new software quality model. As predicted by [7], since in the near future we expect a new SQ model to be proposed and standardized, an evaluation of the evolution of these models so far is an important assessment of the domain. This paper has used NLP techniques in order to determine similarity measures, which are then used to compare the evolution of consecutive SQ models and to compare the current standard, ISO 25010, with the previous ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The software quality community cannot refer to a unique set of concepts and associated meanings when assessing the software quality domain or when introducing a new software quality model. As predicted by [7], since in the near future we expect a new SQ model to be proposed and standardized, an evaluation of the evolution of these models so far is an important assessment of the domain. This paper has used NLP techniques in order to determine similarity measures, which are then used to compare the evolution of consecutive SQ models and to compare the current standard, ISO 25010, with the previous ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the evolution of SQ models, a study taking into account the hierarchy of characteristics-subcharacteristics, relations of subordination between them and special metrics is performed in [6] in the context of ISO 25010, where the need of a more detailed semantic analysis for the disambiguation of quality model components is recognized. The same study was applied in the context of "green software" in [7], and managed to predict the complexity for the next software quality model and to propose variants of green software attributes to be included in the model. It is agreed within the software quality community that in order to apply semantic analysis on SQ models, it is necessary to have a commonly agreedupon model, i.e.…”
Section: Sq Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970s, some software product quality models have been invented and the well-known models among software practitioners and quality researchers are McCall [12], [13], Boehm [12], [13], ISO9126 [12], [13], [25], SQuaRE [16], Dromey and Pragmatic Quality Model (PQF) [11], [31]. This quality models emphasis more on a technical or behavioral aspect of software and very minimum consideration towards the view and perspective of a user or human factors in the assessment.…”
Section: ) Software Quality From Technical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown in [12] for extending SQuaRE by green and reliability issues). Other criteria may be more or less neglected for assessment of PET maturity since they most likely won't play a role.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%