1986
DOI: 10.1109/tr.1986.4335332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Reliability Growth Models with Testing-Effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
163
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early researches related SRGM with respect to testing time [3,17]. However, incorporation of testing resources leads to development of more accurate SRGMs [4,5,9,26]. The reason being, the detection of faults are more intimately linked to the amount of resources expended [18,24] on testing as it includes-(a) Manpower, that takes into account  Testing group (malfunction recognition personnel).…”
Section: 'Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early researches related SRGM with respect to testing time [3,17]. However, incorporation of testing resources leads to development of more accurate SRGMs [4,5,9,26]. The reason being, the detection of faults are more intimately linked to the amount of resources expended [18,24] on testing as it includes-(a) Manpower, that takes into account  Testing group (malfunction recognition personnel).…”
Section: 'Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r represents the fault-detection rate per expended testing-effort at testing time t and s(t)(  dS(t)/dt) is the amount of the testing-effort expended at arbitrary testing time t. In Equation (8), we assume that the fault-detection rate at testing-time t depends on the instantaneous testing-effort expenditures [9]. That means, the testing-team can detect or remove more software faults when the software development manager decides to expend more testing-effort to detect or remove software fault.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing-effort, such as the number of executed test-cases, testing-coverage, and CPU hours expended in the testing phase, is well known as one of the most important factors being related to the software reliability growth process [9]. Under the above background, there is necessity to discuss a testingeffort dependent SRGM on a continuous-state space for the purpose of developing a more plausible continuous-state space SRGM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this function plays an important role in modeling software reliability and it can be described by different distributions. From the studies in [1][2][3][4][5]14], several testing-effort pattern expressions, such as Exponential, Rayleigh, and Weibull-type curves, can be applied.…”
Section: Review Of Srgm With Logistic Testing-effort Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these models, Goel and Okumoto considered an NHPP as the stochastic process to describe the fault process [11]. Yamada et al [1][2][3] modified the G-O model and incorporated the concept of testing-effort in an NHPP model to get a better description of the software fault phenomenon. Later, we [7][8] also proposed a new software reliability growth model with the logistic testing-effort function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%