Software solutions in the processes of creating and using atlas interactive maps

Abstract

Cartographic interactivity is now most often understood as an addition to cartographic representations for end users of electronic maps. The article substantiates the need to extend this understanding. This extension will help in creation of the modern atlas systems, which are increasingly being developed as integrated or consisting of several systems. Along with end users, expert-cartographers (developers) and analysts also become users of atlas systems and their interactive maps. Users with relevant knowledge are combined into epistemologically ordered echelons – the higher the echelon, the more knowledge about interactivity the user should possess. Therefore, atlas interactive cartography should now be considered for many simultaneously operating systems and for many users. Examples of new operations of cartographic interactivity for new echelons of users are given: for expert-cartographers this is a dynamic change (i. e. during the operation of the system) of the cartographic method of modeling actuality, and for analysts, the model itself. A review of software solutions that are used to implement extended cartographic interactivity when creating a new generation of atlas systems has been completed. To prove the results, the methods of new relational cartography are used. In particular, the method of conceptual frameworks of atlas systems is used, which allows combining the methods of classical cartography and the methods of relational cartography into the system method of future system cartography. As examples of the paradigms of classical cartography, the communicative paradigm and growth perspective of R. Roth from the University of Wisconsin-Madison are chosen.

Interactive Maps of Potentially Dangerous Objects of Ukraine: Problems of Database Construction and Visualization

“…У цій статті використовується поняття розширеної картографічної інтерактивності, яку вперше розглянуто в [1]. Там запропоновано розширити інтерактивність, що розуміється у предметних і класичних картографіях як доповнення до представлення за допомогою карт просторових сутностей і явищ реального світу.…”

“…First there was a table from [8, p. 124]. In the work [1], the correspondence of interactivity with [8] and with the Electronic version of the National Atlas of Ukraine (ElNAU) [15] was added to this table. Finally, here is the correspondence of the above table to the SMM Conceptual stratum.…”

“…The article presents new results on extended cartographic interactivity, which was first proposed and substantiated in [1]. There, cartographic interactivity is extended to a stratified notion, the meaning of which varies depending on the stratum on which the interactivity is examined.…”

“…For example, in the 1970s [11, p. 14]has explained the fallacy of understanding the cognition subject in cartography: "The opinion that recognizes geographical maps as the cognition subject of cartography is so widely and persistently spread in cartographic literature that it was accepted almost as official and unconditional. In this regard, the need for a philosophical category 1 was neglected, which could be penetrated into the theory of cartography only through the conceptual definition of the true subject of its cognition". This philosophical category of space-time was represented by A. Aslanikashvili with the help of the notion of an ideal concrete space.…”