Software supportability risk assessment in OT&amp;E (Operational Test and Evaluation): Historical baselines for risk profiles. Volumes 1 and 2

Peercy, David E.; Huebner, W. F.; Estill, Milford; Wu, Jean C.

doi:10.1016/0167-4048(88)90210-6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The monograph specifically indicates that no defence (military) systems were examined. The references (Peercy, 1981;Peercy et al 1985Peercy et al , 1986aPeercy et al , 1986b provide defence systems research that parallels results in this monograph. In the latter research, a Risk Assessment Methodology for Software Supportability (RAMSS) was derived over a period of almost 12 years.…”

Section: Technical Basis For Assessment Methods Two Metricsmentioning

confidence: 61%

Improving the Maintainability of Software

West¹

1996

J. Softw. Maint: Res. Pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThe monograph, Zmproving the Maintainability of Software, has the objective of providing practical guidance on the maintainability of software: maintainability definitions, factors, building and improvement suggestions, and an assessment method.The first part of this review provides an introduction to the monograph and discusses the general software maintainability guidance it provides. The second part provides a more indepth review of the maintainability assessment method.This monograph is easy to read and understand. The guidance provided appeals to common sense and reflects an understanding of many software maintenance concerns. Although the scope of the monograph is primarily business information systems, the guidance is basically sound for many other types of applications in business, industry, government and military organizations. The defined framework of maintainability factors, features, and measures provides interesting guidance for discovering potential areas of concern. Identifying these areas of concern can be a basis for directing action and resources to the more critical maintenance activities. The maintainability assessment method provided by this monograph is not adequately supported by references or detailed information.Definitely read this monograph for its practical guidance. But be careful when applying the maintainability assessment method and analysing the results.

show abstract

Section: Technical Basis For Assessment Methods Two Metricsmentioning

confidence: 61%

Improving the Maintainability of Software

West¹

1996

J. Softw. Maint: Res. Pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Software supportability risk assessment in OT&E (Operational Test and Evaluation): Historical baselines for risk profiles. Volumes 1 and 2

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Improving the Maintainability of Software

Improving the Maintainability of Software

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About