Software tools for quantum control: improving quantum computer performance through noise and error suppression

Abstract

Effectively manipulating quantum computing hardware in the presence of imperfect devices and control systems is a central challenge in realizing useful quantum computers. Susceptibility to noise in particular limits the performance and algorithmic capabilities experienced by end users. Fortunately, in both the NISQ era and beyond, quantum control enables the efficient execution of quantum logic operations and quantum algorithms exhibiting robustness to errors, without the need for complex logical encoding. In this manuscript we introduce the first commercial-grade software tools for the application and integration of quantum control in quantum computing research from Q-CTRL, serving the needs of hardware R&D teams, algorithm developers, and end users. We survey quantum control and its role in combating noise and instability in near-term devices; our primary focus is on quantum firmware, the low-level software solutions designed to enhance the stability of quantum computational hardware at the physical layer. We explain the benefits of quantum firmware not only in error suppression, but also in simplifying higher-level compilation protocols and enhancing the efficiency of quantum error correction. Following this exposition, we provide an overview of Q-CTRL's classical software tools for creating and deploying optimized quantum control solutions at various layers of the quantum computing software stack. We describe our software architecture leveraging both high-performance distributed cloud computation and local custom integration into hardware systems, and explain how key functionality is integrable with other software packages and quantum programming languages. Our presentation includes a detailed technical overview of central product features including a multidimensional control-optimization engine, engineering-inspired filter functions for high-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and a new approach to noise characterization. Finally, we present a series of case studies demonstrating the utility of quantum control solutions derived from these tools in improving the performance of trapped-ion and superconducting quantum computer hardware.

Scalable hyperfine qubit state detection via electron shelving in the 2D5/2 and 2F7Edmunds1, Tan2, Milne3 et al. 2021Phys. Rev. A16070View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…Its effectiveness will be limited by laser frequency drifts and variations in coupling strength due to laser intensity or polarization gradients across the ion string. As both of these effects are often slowly varying or even static "systematic" errors, mitigation through advanced pulse sequences [58][59][60][61] can be considered in addition to regular calibration. Another commonly used routine for accurate population transfer is rapid adiabatic passage (RAP) [62][63][64][65].…”

Survey of Promising Technologies for Quantum Drones and Networks

“…The quantum-based technologies can integrate existing infrastructure with long-distance connectivity and are helpful for space, air, and underwater technologies and networks. Ball et al[261] discussed the importance of software tools in quantum control solutions. Real-time experiments-based observations are identified for reducing the error and noise and improving the performance of the quantum computer.…”

Quantum Oscillator Noise Spectroscopy via Displaced Cat States

“…Such fluctuations have been probed in trapped ions using coherent displacements [14,15] and large superpositions of number states [15,16]. Noise spectroscopy of the oscillator system can identify performance-limiting error sources, assess their relative weights, and inform appropriately tailored error-mitigation strategies through quantum control engineering [17].…”

“…3(a)]. We solve for s by employing an approach based on convex optimization [17] used for the first time in experiment here. In this framework, the noise spectrum s is estimated by minimizing the objective function…”

“…The term λkDsk 2 2 is a regularization term where D is the first-order derivative operator (minimizing kDsk 2 2 enforces smoothness in s) and λ is a hyperparameter tuned via a standard method to prevent under or overfitting [30]; a strict-positivity requirement prevents overfitting-induced oscillations [17]. This convex-optimization approach to spectrum estimation enables the use of arbitrary sets of measurements with no requirements on the underlying measurement probe structures unlike in dynamical decoupling-based spectroscopy [42,43].…”