Software-Werkzeuge zur Unterstützung des Technologie-Roadmapping

Isenmann, Ralf

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74755-0_12

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…technologies) to other issues relevant in that context (e.g. products, applications and/or developments in the political, economic, social environment)" [Isenmann, 2008]. Examples of high-profile roadmaps, e.g., the US Department of Energy roadmaps related to the building and construction sector, highlight the importance of involving stakeholders from across the innovation system -"participants representing all phases of building process/stakeholders (manufacturers, developers, contractors, owners, architects, engineers…)".…”

Section: The Iterative Nature Of Roadmappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are, however, variations in emphasis (and challenges) when applying the approach at an innovation system or industrial levels. In contrast to firm-level technology roadmapping, innovation system-level exercises may involve even more complex analyses (with a more diverse set of stakeholders), more complex and longer term innovation system dynamics, and broader socio-political trends and drivers [Cho et al, 2016;Isenmann, 2008;Schuh et al, 2013]. Furthermore, unlike firm-level roadmaps, where the stakeholders 'commissioning' the roadmap are often the same ones that will use the outputs, governmentcommissioned foresight exercises are often intended to generate an evidence base to be used by a range of different public sector actors (e.g., research and innovation agencies, research and technology organizations) for their individual strategic purposes [Cho et al, 2016;Schuh et al, 2013].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight

O’Sullivan¹,

Phaal²,

Featherston³

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology roadmapping has become an important foresight tool for science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy and technology strategy development. There are, however, challenges in translating evidence from foresight into the strategies of STI agencies and the planning of research & technology development (RTD) organizations. While the foresight evaluation literature identifies methodological issues related to evidence granularity, scope, and stakeholder confidence, there is limited guidance on how to ensure roadmapping outputs are strategically relevant, appropriately detailed, and credible. This paper highlights the potential of using structured visual roadmapping frameworks to anticipate potential strategic foresight evidence failures and using the adaptive and iterative nature of roadmapping processes to address them. In this paper, we distinguish between: the roadmapping framework ‘canvas’; the foresight evidence captured on the canvas; the process of generating the evidence; and any final strategic plan developed using that evidence (with goals, milestones, actions, etc). We investigate efforts to use the roadmapping canvas as a research tool and diagnostic to explore emerging technology trajectories and innovation ‘pathways’. We demonstrate that key patterns of evidence distribution on the roadmapping canvas have the potential to reveal where further evidence may need to be gathered, or where further triangulation of stakeholder perspectives may be required. We argue that by adaptively addressing these patterns at key stages within the roadmapping process (and appropriately re-scoping, re-prioritizing, and re-focusing foresight effort and resources), the granularity, coverage, and consensus of the roadmapping evidence can be greatly enhanced. We conclude the paper by summarizing a set of novel principles for adaptive agile roadmapping, reflecting on the implications for foresight more generally, and outlining a future research agenda to test and refine this approach to agile foresight.

show abstract

Section: The Iterative Nature Of Roadmappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight

O’Sullivan¹,

Phaal²,

Featherston³

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Editorial Staffmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are, however, variations in emphasis (and challenges) when applying the approach at an innovation system or industrial levels. In contrast to firm-level technology roadmapping, innovation system-level exercises may involve even more complex analyses (with a more diverse set of stakeholders), more complex and longer term innovation system dynamics, and broader socio-political trends and drivers Isenmann, 2008;Schuh et al, 2013]. Furthermore, unlike firm-level roadmaps, where the stakeholders 'commissioning' the roadmap are often the same ones that will use the outputs, governmentcommissioned foresight exercises are often intended to generate an evidence base to be used by a range of different public sector actors (e.g., research and innovation agencies, research and technology organizations) for their individual strategic purposes Schuh et al, 2013].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is an international interdisciplinary peer-reviewed openaccess journal. It publishes original research articles, offering new theoretical insights and practice-oriented knowledge in important areas of strategic planning and the creation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy, and it examines possible and alternative futures in all human endeavors in order to make such insights available to the right person at the right time to ensure the right decision.The journal acts as a scientific forum, contributing to the interaction between researchers, policy makers, and other actors involved in innovation processes. It encompasses all facets of STI policy and the creation of technological, managerial, product, and social innovations. Foresight and STI Governance welcomes works from scholars based in all parts of the world. Topics covered include:• Foresight methodologies and best practices;• Long-term socioeconomic priorities for strategic planning and policy making;• Innovative strategies at the national, regional, sectoral, and corporate levels;• The development of National Innovation Systems;• The exploration of the innovation lifecycle from idea to market;• Technological trends, breakthroughs, and grand challenges;• Technological change and its implications for economy, policy-making, and society;• Corporate innovation management;• Human capital in STI; and many others.The target audience of the journal comprises research scholars, university professors, postgraduates, policy-makers, business people, the expert community, undergraduates, and others who are interested in S&T and innovation analyses, foresight studies, and policy issues.Foresight and STI Governance is published quarterly and distributed worldwide. It is an open-access electronic journal and is available online for free via: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/ The journal is included into the 1st quartile (Q1) of the Scopus Cite Score Rank in the fields: Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)

show abstract

Grundlagen des Technologie-Roadmapping

Möhrle¹,

Isenmann²

2016

Technologie-Roadmapping

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software-Werkzeuge zur Unterstützung des Technologie-Roadmapping

Cited by 6 publications

References 9 publications

Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight

Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight

Untitled

Grundlagen des Technologie-Roadmapping

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About