1985
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0642292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softwood Chipping Fines: Efficacy as Poultry Litter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mould counts were also similar for the different litter materials, especially by the end of the study. Parsons and Baker (1985) reported that broilers reared on softwood chipping fines, a by-product of paper manufacturing, had equal body weights and feed conversions in comparison with birds reared on pine shavings. Broilers reared on the chipping fines also had 58% fewer carcass downgrades and 64% more Grade "A" carcasses than birds reared on shavings.…”
Section: Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mould counts were also similar for the different litter materials, especially by the end of the study. Parsons and Baker (1985) reported that broilers reared on softwood chipping fines, a by-product of paper manufacturing, had equal body weights and feed conversions in comparison with birds reared on pine shavings. Broilers reared on the chipping fines also had 58% fewer carcass downgrades and 64% more Grade "A" carcasses than birds reared on shavings.…”
Section: Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And used and unused bedding materials are both considered litter. Materials used as poultry litter should be absorbent, dust-free, not consumed by the bird, easily handled and shipped, and inexpensive (Parsons and Baker, 1985). The litter material must not retain excessive moisture as this creates a reservoir for disease causing organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the United States, primary choices for bedding materials include pine wood shavings, peanut hulls, and rice hulls, having pine shavings and sawdust as the most desirable options ( Malone and Gedamu, 1995 ). Additional materials that have undergone scrutiny as potential litter bedding options, demonstrating comparable performance, include paper products ( Malone et al, 1982 ; Malone and Gedamu, 1995 ), gypsum ( Wyatt and Goodman, 1992 ; Watts et al, 2017 ; Galli et al, 2021 ), hardwood bark ( Brake et al, 1992 ), rice hull ash ( Chamblee and Yeatman, 2003 ), softwood chipping fines (by-product of the paper manufacturing industry) ( Parsons and Baker, 1985 ), sand ( Bowers et al, 2003 ), and even composted municipal waste ( Malone et al, 1983 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%