2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(02)00389-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOI-based fabrication processes of the scanning mirror having vertical comb fingers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of using a SOI-based bulk microfabrication process are: Excellent mechanical properties, such as high yield strength, low residual stress and good fatigue resistance, and improvement of reliability [18]. Fig.…”
Section: B Silicon-on-insulator (Soi)-based Microfabrication Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of using a SOI-based bulk microfabrication process are: Excellent mechanical properties, such as high yield strength, low residual stress and good fatigue resistance, and improvement of reliability [18]. Fig.…”
Section: B Silicon-on-insulator (Soi)-based Microfabrication Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic actuation is commonly used for MEMS, including scanning mirrors [7,8,11,[18][19][20], with the two basic configurations being gap-closing and comb-drive. The large displacements required of the printer scanning mirror do not easily permit small gaps for either configuration, and so the actuation voltages would be unreasonably high.…”
Section: Actuator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the misalignment between these two layers is a challenge (Jeong and Lee 2005;Tsou et al 2005;Chung and Hsu 2008;Zhang et al 2005;Hah et al 2004b;Ki-Hun and Lee 2003). Various methods were used to overcome or avoid misalignment (Krishnamoorthy et al 2003;Zhang et al 2005;Hah et al 2004b;Ki-Hun and Lee 2003;Kwon et al 2004;Conant et al 2000;Lee et al 2002). These methods are complex and of high cost (Selvakumar and Najaf 2003;Tsou et al 2005;Kwon et al 2004;Conant et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%