2003
DOI: 10.2113/2.1.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Aggregate Structure Effects on Dielectric Permittivity of an Andisol Measured by Time Domain Reflectometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Well‐aggregated soils have two distinct pore systems: intraaggregate and interaggregate. While the former pore system contributes to soil water retention characteristics at low matric potentials, the latter contributes at high matric potentials (Miyamoto et al, 2003). The observed soil water retention data with a dual‐porosity model fit are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Well‐aggregated soils have two distinct pore systems: intraaggregate and interaggregate. While the former pore system contributes to soil water retention characteristics at low matric potentials, the latter contributes at high matric potentials (Miyamoto et al, 2003). The observed soil water retention data with a dual‐porosity model fit are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water distribution in an aggregated soil: (a) observed and predicted soil water retention curves using a dual‐porosity model for the Andisol sample used for air permeability measurements (adapted from Miyamoto et al, 2003), and (b) air permeability as a function of air content for the Andisol at 8‐kPa confined pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response of TDR‐measured K a to increasing water content (θ) in soils with bimodal pore‐size distributions has been the subject of a significant number of studies in the soil science literature (Dirksen and Dasberg, 1993; Friedman, 1998; Jones and Or, 2003; Miyamoto et al, 2003, 2005; Blonquist et al, 2006; Robinson et al, 2009). The relationship between K a and θ in these soils, the K a (θ) function, often displays a distinct increase in slope after θ surpasses a threshold value, often called the critical water content, θ cr (Miyamoto et al, 2003). The interpretation of this change in slope has been aided by the application of dielectric mixing models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of ε bw ′ with mixing models is subject to considerable uncertainty because (i) it is probably a function of distance from soil particle surfaces for which there are only limited measurements available, and (ii) an average of the permittivity of all bound water layers must be calculated to represent ε bw ′ in the mixing model (Friedman, 1998; Or and Wraith, 1999; Robinson et al, 2002). Bound water phases were also included in the mixing model investigations of Friedman (1998), Or and Wraith (1999), and Miyamoto et al (2003, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%