2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil and biomass mercury emissions during a prescribed fire in the Amazonian rain forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
40
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that the highest GEM values are concentrated into short peaks, clustered more heavily around the mid-to late dry season. In the absence of local anthropogenic sources, this is considered consistent with biomassburning events and the associated release of mercury from volatilisation and thermal desorption from vegetation and soils (Melendez-Perez et al, 2014). These biomass-burning events occur extensively in northern Australia throughout the dry season as the result of natural and accidental lighting, as well as part of local land management practices (RusselSmith et al, 2007).…”
Section: Overall Means and Seasonal Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that the highest GEM values are concentrated into short peaks, clustered more heavily around the mid-to late dry season. In the absence of local anthropogenic sources, this is considered consistent with biomassburning events and the associated release of mercury from volatilisation and thermal desorption from vegetation and soils (Melendez-Perez et al, 2014). These biomass-burning events occur extensively in northern Australia throughout the dry season as the result of natural and accidental lighting, as well as part of local land management practices (RusselSmith et al, 2007).…”
Section: Overall Means and Seasonal Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, developing good estimates of the load released from these sources is critical to addressing uncertainties in our understanding of the global mercury cycle (Lindberg et al, 2007). Mercury is known to be emitted during forest fires (Friedli et al, 2001;Veiga et al, 1994), and numerous studies have reported the emission of the metal during biomass burning (Friedli et al, 2003;Sigler et al, 2003;Turetsky et al, 2006), including a companion study at the same site in Acre, Brazil (Melendez-Perez et al, 2014). However, less is known about the effect that forest fires and other forms of deforestation have on the release of gaseous mercury from soil in the local environment following the deforestation event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on soil and biomass mercury emissions during a wildfire in an Amazonian rain forest showed that mercury release rate from different plant components and soil layers differed greatly due to combustion completeness which is defined as the ratio of biomass consumed by fire to total available biomass category (MelendezPerez et al, 2014). In this study, we referenced the combustion completeness suggested by Melendez-Perez et al (2014) and assumed that all herbs was burnt and mercury was completely emitted to the atmosphere from the complete combustion of biomass. Mercury emission from each type of biomass and soils were shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Estimation Of Potential Mercury Release From Wildfiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other heavy metals, the biogeochemical cycling of mercury between atmosphere and forest terrestrial ecosystem is particularly important for subtropical ecosystems because huge amount of biomass was contained in subtropical forests and peat lands and forest was supposed to a large sinks of atmospheric mercury (Zhou et al, 2013(Zhou et al, , 2015bStankwitz et al, 2012). Coupled with global warming accelerated in northern latitudes (Raisanen, 1997) and high drought frequency in southwest China (Zhang and Zhou, 2015), these were of great scientific and public interest because of heightening wildfire activity and increasing mercury and carbon release to the atmosphere (Melendez-Perez et al, 2014;Friedli et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%