2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil and soil environmental quality monitoring in China: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
127
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by looking at other pieces of research, it is still possible to note some discrepancies. With reference to agricultural soils, the percentage of 19.4 of arable land not meeting soil standards is close to data from a survey conducted by the MEP in 2011, targeting 364 villages, in which 21.5% of samples did not meet quality standards [62]. The claim that 1.1% of total soils were severely polluted appears to be at odds with other findings.…”
Section: Soilcontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…However, by looking at other pieces of research, it is still possible to note some discrepancies. With reference to agricultural soils, the percentage of 19.4 of arable land not meeting soil standards is close to data from a survey conducted by the MEP in 2011, targeting 364 villages, in which 21.5% of samples did not meet quality standards [62]. The claim that 1.1% of total soils were severely polluted appears to be at odds with other findings.…”
Section: Soilcontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Approximately 8.3 % of 120 million hectares of arable land in China is contaminated by anthropogenic activities including metalliferous mining and smelting, chemical industry, fossil fuel combustion, waste incineration, agricultural activities, and atmospheric deposition (Environmental Protection Report submitted to 11th National People's Congress of China 2011; Teng et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 2 million tons of residue from chromite ore processing was generated during that period and was disposed across Hudson County, NJ [88]. The toxicity of Cr in the soil environment largely depends on the mobility and solubility of the presenting Cr species (Cr 0 , Cr 3+ and Cr 6+ ), in neutral or basic soil environment, Cr predominantly present in the tetravalent form as Cr(OH) 3 , which has very little mobility and solubility in water, hence limited bioavailability [85,89]. Therefore, Ellis Island soil might not pose a risk to the plants and microbes even with observed high Cr levels.…”
Section: Acid Extractable Major and Heavy Metals In Ellis Island Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modern age, rapid urbanization processes have unavoidably introduced increasing amount of contaminants, including heavy metals, into soils through various sources such as industrial wastes, agricultural fertilizer and pesticide application, as well as sewage sludge discharge [2][3][4]. Urban soil is strongly influenced by anthropogenic activities and exhibits distinct characteristics from background soils, including greater vertical and spatial variability, interrupted nutrient cycling, modified biological community and relatively high levels of metal contaminants [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%