2002
DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.9.4480-4485.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil-Atmosphere CO Exchanges and Microbial Biogeochemistry of CO Transformations in a Brazilian Agricultural Ecosystem

Abstract: Although anthropogenic land use has major impacts on the exchange of soil and atmosphere gas in general, relatively little is known about its impacts on carbon monoxide. We compared soil-atmosphere CO exchanges as a function of land use, crop type, and tillage treatment on an experimental farm in Parãna, Brazil, that is representative of regionally important agricultural ecosystems. Our results showed that cultivated soils consumed CO at rates between 3 and 6 mg of CO m ؊2 day ؊1 , with no statistically signif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all isolates oxidize CO at levels Ͻ 1%, high concentrations inhibit CO utilization for most of the strains used in this study. This is consistent with previous reports for a high-affinity soil isolate (14) and intact soil (22,27). Thus, it appears that two groups of CO oxidizers may be distinguished: a CO-tolerant group consisting of isolates that grow with high CO and a CO-sensitive group inhibited by concentrations higher than about 1%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although all isolates oxidize CO at levels Ͻ 1%, high concentrations inhibit CO utilization for most of the strains used in this study. This is consistent with previous reports for a high-affinity soil isolate (14) and intact soil (22,27). Thus, it appears that two groups of CO oxidizers may be distinguished: a CO-tolerant group consisting of isolates that grow with high CO and a CO-sensitive group inhibited by concentrations higher than about 1%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The physiological basis for the distinction between these groups is not yet apparent. However, the latter may be more significant in situ, judging on the basis of responses of soil to elevated CO levels (22,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SM, a forested site, emitted CO to the atmosphere, and thus represents an exception among the Miyake-jima samples, including, CL, a somewhat older forested site. CO emission by forested soils is not unusual however 15,16,19,26) , and SM emission rates are comparable to those reported for other forested soils 15,16,19,26) . The difference between net CO emission by SM and uptake by CL may be attributed to a greater litter layer and higher organic contents at the former; both of these variables have been associated previously with CO emission 15,26) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A distinct decrease in CO uptake occurs for site II-C, however. This site, with a carbon content of about 20%, appears to behave similarly to continental forests, in which elevated abiological CO production linked to organic matter decreases net CO uptake from the atmosphere (19,30,31). Thus, recent Hawaiian volcanic deposits exhibit the full range of interactions between CO and organic matter dynamics.…”
Section: Vol 69 2003mentioning
confidence: 80%