2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.022
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil classification analysis based on piezocone penetration test data — A case study from a quick-clay landslide site in southwestern Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of the division of the loess subsoil based on the results of static soundings is shown in Figure 11. SBT charts (e.g., Robertson's chart) classify soils in terms of their behavior and are widely used to interpret the soil profile [20,38,[45][46][47]. For aeolian loess soils, R f values most often range from 1.7 to 3.2%, which, with relatively high cone resistances q c , locates them in the area on the border between silty and sandy loess, and very often they are classified as sandy.…”
Section: Qcmean/σ (Mpa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of the division of the loess subsoil based on the results of static soundings is shown in Figure 11. SBT charts (e.g., Robertson's chart) classify soils in terms of their behavior and are widely used to interpret the soil profile [20,38,[45][46][47]. For aeolian loess soils, R f values most often range from 1.7 to 3.2%, which, with relatively high cone resistances q c , locates them in the area on the border between silty and sandy loess, and very often they are classified as sandy.…”
Section: Qcmean/σ (Mpa)mentioning
confidence: 99%