2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil classification provides a poor indicator of carbon turnover rates in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prepare the plant material, it was extracted twice with distilled water (80 °C, 4 h) to remove the soluble 14 C component (32·9 ± 1·5% of the total 14 C label). Of the high MW 14 C remaining, 26·7 ± 1·0% was soluble in HCl (0·08 m ), 43·8 ± 0·7% was NaOH (1 m ) soluble and 29·5 ± 3·4% remained insoluble (Jones & Darrah ; Simfukwe et al ., ). Briefly, 100 mg of 14 C‐labelled plant material was added to the surface of each 5 g soil sample (46 mg C g −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To prepare the plant material, it was extracted twice with distilled water (80 °C, 4 h) to remove the soluble 14 C component (32·9 ± 1·5% of the total 14 C label). Of the high MW 14 C remaining, 26·7 ± 1·0% was soluble in HCl (0·08 m ), 43·8 ± 0·7% was NaOH (1 m ) soluble and 29·5 ± 3·4% remained insoluble (Jones & Darrah ; Simfukwe et al ., ). Briefly, 100 mg of 14 C‐labelled plant material was added to the surface of each 5 g soil sample (46 mg C g −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Samples were stored at 4 C prior to analysis for key characteristics including pH, total C and N, mineralisable C and N, Olsen-P (0.5 M NaHCO 3 , pH 8.5), bulk density and soil biota as described in Emmett et al (2008Emmett et al ( , 2010, Simfukwe et al (2011) and Reynolds et al (2013). All remaining sample was then air-dried and sieved prior to long term storage and use in this study.…”
Section: Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to represent the archive's spatial diversity, the samples were stratified according to their "Environmental Zone" e nine classifications derived from Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Land Classes which reflect an array of geographically distinct regions of Britain (Bunce et al, 1996). Across all land use and vegetation classes the dominant soil types (% of total) were brown soils (33%), surface water gley soils (19%), podzolic soils (14%), peat soils (12%), groundwater gley soils (11%), lithomorphic soils (8%) and pelosol soils (3%) (Avery, 1990;Simfukwe et al, 2011). These soils were assessed using the novel BBP extraction regime described below and for total C based on loss-on-ignition (Nelson and Sommers, 1982;Reynolds et al, 2012).…”
Section: Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical method partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis was performed to assess the relationships between R s rates and selected physicochemical properties in farmlands (Conforti et al 2015). The relationship assessment standard of PLS was to plot the 50 g Soil with 0.14 % (w/w) biochar addition C3 50 g Soil with 0.21 % (w/w) biochar addition w*'s and c's of one regression dimension against another, which can assess the relationships of R s with multiple parameters at the same time (Simfukwe et al 2011). The R s rate was chosen as the dependent variable Y and nine soil physicochemical parameters were considered as the independent variable X, which presented the information of the dominant factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%