2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(99)00141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil creep process and its role in debris slide generation — field measurements on the north side of Tsukuba Mountain in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field observations worldwide have investigated sporadic and chronic sediment transport within headwater channels and landslide scars in steep terrain (Shimokawa, ; Trustrum and DeRose, ; Benda, ; Onda, ; Bovis and Jakob, ; Sasaki et al, ). Such sediment transport involves a complex set of hydrologic, geomorphic, and biological feedbacks including soil creep, surface wash, dry ravel, slumping and sloughing around the original headwall, small landslides, and inputs of woody debris (Dietrich and Dunne, ; Sasaki et al, ; Sidle and Ochiai, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Field observations worldwide have investigated sporadic and chronic sediment transport within headwater channels and landslide scars in steep terrain (Shimokawa, ; Trustrum and DeRose, ; Benda, ; Onda, ; Bovis and Jakob, ; Sasaki et al, ). Such sediment transport involves a complex set of hydrologic, geomorphic, and biological feedbacks including soil creep, surface wash, dry ravel, slumping and sloughing around the original headwall, small landslides, and inputs of woody debris (Dietrich and Dunne, ; Sasaki et al, ; Sidle and Ochiai, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations worldwide have investigated sporadic and chronic sediment transport within headwater channels and landslide scars in steep terrain (Shimokawa, ; Trustrum and DeRose, ; Benda, ; Onda, ; Bovis and Jakob, ; Sasaki et al, ). Such sediment transport involves a complex set of hydrologic, geomorphic, and biological feedbacks including soil creep, surface wash, dry ravel, slumping and sloughing around the original headwall, small landslides, and inputs of woody debris (Dietrich and Dunne, ; Sasaki et al, ; Sidle and Ochiai, ). Sediment flux into landslide scars generally is rapid at first because of the active mass movements such as collapse of the head scarp and flanks, then progressively slower as infilling is dominated by more chronic processes such as soil creep, surface erosion, and dry ravel (Sidle, ; Trustrum and DeRose, ; Dietrich et al, ; Heimsath et al, ; Sidle and Ochiai, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their research shows that among many hydrodynamic factors, the runoff power on the slope is the most closely related to the average sediment transport rate of runoff, and the runoff power is the factor that can best reflect the soil erosion rate. It is easier to analyze and simulate the soil erosion process by using runoff kinetic energy and power theory [42,43]. Previous studies have shown that vegetation type, vegetation coverage, vegetation litter, humus, and roots are important factors affecting soil erosion on slopes.…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation Community Restoration On the Hydrodynamentioning
confidence: 99%