2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-019-01182-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil emergence of Drosophila suzukii adults: a susceptible period for entomopathogenic nematodes infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in agreement with our study, S. riobrave was reported to cause high levels of pupal mortality in another fruit fly A. fraterculus (Barbosa-Negrisoli et al, 2009). In contrast, other studies did not observe pupal infection among different species of fruit flies when exposed to various EPNs strains (Yee and Lacey, 2003;Malan and Manrakhan, 2009;Langford et al, 2014;Garriga et al, 2020). For example, Yee and Lacey (2003) did not observe any pupal mortality in R. indifferens when treated with S. carpocapsae, S. interdium, and S. feltiae.…”
Section: Controlsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in agreement with our study, S. riobrave was reported to cause high levels of pupal mortality in another fruit fly A. fraterculus (Barbosa-Negrisoli et al, 2009). In contrast, other studies did not observe pupal infection among different species of fruit flies when exposed to various EPNs strains (Yee and Lacey, 2003;Malan and Manrakhan, 2009;Langford et al, 2014;Garriga et al, 2020). For example, Yee and Lacey (2003) did not observe any pupal mortality in R. indifferens when treated with S. carpocapsae, S. interdium, and S. feltiae.…”
Section: Controlsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Numerous studies have been conducted to measure EPN efficacy against tephritids including Rhagoletis indifferens Curran (Stark and Lacey, 1999;Yee and Lacey, 2003), Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Kepenekci et al, 2015), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Karagoz et al, 2009;Malan and Manrakhan, 2009;Rohde et al, 2010), several Anastrepha species (Toledo et al, 2005(Toledo et al, , 2006(Toledo et al, , 2009Barbosa-Negrisoli et al, 2009;Heve et al, 2017Heve et al, , 2018 as well as Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Lindegren and Vail, 1986), Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Sirjani et al, 2009;Langford et al, 2014), and Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) (Cuthbertson et al, 2014;Garriga et al, 2018Garriga et al, , 2020. To the best of our knowledge, no previous research has been conducted on the efficacy of EPNs against R. pomonella.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third stage of D. suzukii larvae used for all assays was obtained from a laboratory culture of specimens collected in Catalonia (NE Spain) in 2012. These insects were reared on a Drosophila diet [37] and maintained in a climate chamber at 25 • C, 45% RH, and a 12:12 h photoperiod.…”
Section: Insects and Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with larvae of D. suzukii showed a strong immune response of encapsulation to parasitoid eggs of Leptopilina heterotoma Thompson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) that discourages their use for controlling the pest [32,33]. Instead, pupal parasitoids, entomopathogenic fungi, and EPNs achieved better results controlling the fly under laboratory conditions [34][35][36][37]. Susceptibility of D. suzukii larvae was evaluated against different EPN species, as S. carpocapsae, Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can help to determine the action sites of these compounds on insects. However, considering that these findings has not been fully explained, we are aware that new tests, focused especially on the selectivity of these botanists over natural enemies intentionally released 63 , 64 and naturally present in the environment 65 , 66 , may in the future subsidize methods for integrating natural enemies and the development of EO-based biopesticides. Despite this, the use of these substances as such has limitations due to flammability, low dispersion in water, phytotoxicity 67 69 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%