2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil fauna responses to natural disturbances, invasive species, and global climate change: Current state of the science and a call to action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
138
2
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 278 publications
6
138
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our synthesis revealed two major knowledge gaps: 1) the biotic mechanisms by which soil food webs are influenced by fire and, 2) approaches to studying the responses of soil biota to fire in the context of global change. As with much of the soil ecology literature (Coyle et al ), there is a clear gap in our understanding of how higher trophic levels respond to fire (Zaitsev et al ). It is necessary to consider taxa in higher trophic levels and how they interact with primary consumers and the rest of the food web when seeking to understand shifts in ecosystem function to fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our synthesis revealed two major knowledge gaps: 1) the biotic mechanisms by which soil food webs are influenced by fire and, 2) approaches to studying the responses of soil biota to fire in the context of global change. As with much of the soil ecology literature (Coyle et al ), there is a clear gap in our understanding of how higher trophic levels respond to fire (Zaitsev et al ). It is necessary to consider taxa in higher trophic levels and how they interact with primary consumers and the rest of the food web when seeking to understand shifts in ecosystem function to fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the focus on microorganisms has precluded a comprehensive view of entire soil biological communities and their functions to fire (Zaitsev et al ). Disturbances can exert positive, negative, and neutral effects on soil organisms that are often species specific (Coyle et al ). From the resistance and resilience framework (Holling , Holling and Gunderson ), resistant soil communities might exhibit a neutral response to a perturbation and maintain their biomass, abundance, and composition after disturbance while resilient communities change due to disturbance but return to their original structure after some period of time (Allison and Martiny ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the well‐known geographic patterns in the diversity and abundance of aboveground organisms (Hillebrand, 2004; Mannion, Upchurch, Benson, & Goswami, 2014), the geographic patterns of belowground organisms are relatively understudied (but see Decaëns, 2010; Hendershot, Read, Henning, Sanders, & Classen, 2017; Maraun, Schatz, & Scheu, 2007). Because of the important interactions between aboveground and belowground processes, a better understanding of geographic patterns of belowground organisms is needed (Fierer, Strickland, Liptzin, Bradford, & Cleveland, 2009; Lu, He, Ding, & Siemann, 2018; van der Putten, 2012; Wilschut et al, 2019), especially in light of multiple global change factors (Bardgett & Wardle, 2010; Coyle et al, 2017) that may perturb both aboveground and belowground communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses of these micro‐arthropods to environmental manipulations are complex (Coyle et al. ) because micro‐arthropod communities are simultaneously linked to vegetation (Coulson et al. , Mitchell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Arctic and alpine ecosystems, where soil macrofauna (e.g., earthworms) is often absent, micro-arthropods, such as Collembola (springtails) and Acari (mites), are a conspicuous and ubiquitous component of soil fauna. The responses of these micro-arthropods to environmental manipulations are complex (Coyle et al 2017) because micro-arthropod communities are simultaneously linked to vegetation (Coulson et al 2003, Mitchell et al 2016, to food availability (many soil micro-arthropods are fungivorous or bacterivorous species), and to microclimatic conditions (Coulson et al 1996, Hodkinson et al 1998, Sjursen et al 2005. On the species level, responses of micro-arthropods are likely to be trait-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%