2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil hydrothermal modeling in a dry alpine agricultural zone: The effect of soil airflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other models, the model used here can theoretically reduce structure‐based errors in porous soils where soil airflow can affect soil water migration (Prunty & Bell, 2007; Y. Zeng et al., 2011a). Our previous study showed that soil moisture modeling accuracy can be markedly increased by coupling the airflow mechanism during >22.8 mm rainfall events (J. X. Wang et al., 2021). Furthermore, B. Yang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other models, the model used here can theoretically reduce structure‐based errors in porous soils where soil airflow can affect soil water migration (Prunty & Bell, 2007; Y. Zeng et al., 2011a). Our previous study showed that soil moisture modeling accuracy can be markedly increased by coupling the airflow mechanism during >22.8 mm rainfall events (J. X. Wang et al., 2021). Furthermore, B. Yang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other influential parameters were selected based on sensitivity analyses previously performed by J. Wang et al. (2021a). Parameters selected for the analysis were perturbed by varying each parameter by ±30%, ±20%, and ±10% while keeping the others fixed to the value of the control simulation (after initial parameterization).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to modeling, we applied a one‐factor‐at‐a‐time approach (Wang et al., 2021) to test the sensitivity of soil P dynamics model parameters (see Supporting Information). Because most of the datasets were collected from official or international agencies, and there was no repetitive datasets available to cross‐validate them, uncertainties from the datasets (e.g., clerical errors) were not analyzed and as a consequence we only addressed the uncertainties of parameters of the P cycle model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table S10 summarized the soil P dynamics model parameters used in this study. We used the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and the index of agreement ( d ) (Li et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2021) to assess the modeling accuracy, expressed asR2goodbreak=n*i=1i=n)(Simi*Obsii=1i=nSimi*i=1i=nObsin*i=1i=nSimi2i=1i=nSimi2*n*i=1i=nObsi2i=1i=nObsnormali22,dgoodbreak=1goodbreak−i=1i=nSimiObsi2i=1i=nSimiObstrue¯+ObsiObstrue¯2,where n is the number of paired observed and simulated values, Obsi is the i th observed value, trueObs¯ is the mean obs...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation