Forest and Rangeland Soils of the United States Under Changing Conditions 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45216-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Mapping, Monitoring, and Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among different soil units (SU), factor analysis of soil properties showed that upon varimax rotation, the principal components were characterized as indicators, explaining 78.9, 81.1, 82.0, and 80.5% of the total variance for Fluvisols, Calcisols, Cambisols, and Luvisols respectively (Tables 7 and 8). As our findings showed, the use of soil maps can efficiently deliver soil information to meet user needs for soil management and crop performance decisions, which is in accordance with previous studies [7,51] As was observed, the spatial variability in agricultural land is attributed both to geogenic factors and anthropogenic interventions. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the clustering of soil properties based on the SU and LU could better describe the variability of soil properties in Mediterranean smallholder farming, which was in line with previous studies [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Among different soil units (SU), factor analysis of soil properties showed that upon varimax rotation, the principal components were characterized as indicators, explaining 78.9, 81.1, 82.0, and 80.5% of the total variance for Fluvisols, Calcisols, Cambisols, and Luvisols respectively (Tables 7 and 8). As our findings showed, the use of soil maps can efficiently deliver soil information to meet user needs for soil management and crop performance decisions, which is in accordance with previous studies [7,51] As was observed, the spatial variability in agricultural land is attributed both to geogenic factors and anthropogenic interventions. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the clustering of soil properties based on the SU and LU could better describe the variability of soil properties in Mediterranean smallholder farming, which was in line with previous studies [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Traditionally, it has been done using polygon‐based approaches where equal values are given to defined categories, such as soil types (Cheng et al, 2019), or by parameterizing process‐based models to predict soil N across space and time (Grunwald, 2009). Spatial modeling could offer insight into trends, how changes in climate, environmental contaminants, and land management can alter soil properties by utilizing measurements from monitoring networks (Kimsey et al, 2020). However, these efforts have usually missed facets such as depth, uncertainty estimates, and information about ecological or functional relationships (Villarreal & Vargas, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also used an external validation data set and found a good fit with an RMSE = 0.26% C. Other researchers that have measured the 350-2500 nm spectrum have found similar predictive capabilities within the visible spectrum for soil N and N at 400-480 nm, 640-700 nm, 418 nm, 470 nm, 760 nm, and ferrous and ferric iron oxides at 400 nm, 450 nm, 510 nm, 550 nm, 700 nm, 870 nm and 1000 nm across a range of Oxisols in Madagascar. Use of the visible spectrum to monitor soil carbon constituents has been scaled up to regional, national and global scales via efforts such as the NRCS Soils2026 initiative [29,30] and for implementing global policies that foster Sustainable Development Goals. The application of portable field -based active and passive remote and spectroradiometers proximal sensors to measure soil properties is a growing area of research and is a natural progression to expedite further the measurement of soil properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of agencies and organizations are involved in creating and maintaining soil spectral libraries to predict soil properties [32][33][34]. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) initiatives that inventory and assess the impact of land use and management on soil resources are limited by a lack of site-specific information and scope of measurements required to aggregate and interpret natural resource databases at regional, national and global scales [29,35]. The current Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) digital mapping of dynamic soil properties to quantify soil landscapes and properties to enhance conservation planning is also limited by the number of measurements required to complete the Soils2026 initiative [30,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%