1994
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90144-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil microbial biomass and microbial activity in soils treated with heavy metal contaminated sewage sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
156
4
27

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
156
4
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, BSR and enzyme activities were higher in R1 but lower in R2 and R3 soils indicating that the microbes have greater potential in SOM decomposition and carbon flow to the atmosphere (Schlesinger and Andrews 2000) in an unpolluted soil, and soil contamination caused negative impacts on the soil microbiological characteristics. While some studies observed a certain increase of microbial activities in contaminated soils (Fließbach et al 1994). This discrepancy was likely due to differences in contamination level and microbial community structure which varied with soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, BSR and enzyme activities were higher in R1 but lower in R2 and R3 soils indicating that the microbes have greater potential in SOM decomposition and carbon flow to the atmosphere (Schlesinger and Andrews 2000) in an unpolluted soil, and soil contamination caused negative impacts on the soil microbiological characteristics. While some studies observed a certain increase of microbial activities in contaminated soils (Fließbach et al 1994). This discrepancy was likely due to differences in contamination level and microbial community structure which varied with soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in fact, many hyperaccumulators are slow in growth and inhibited in the presence of high concentration of heavy metals. On the other hand, the heavy metal contamination has great effects on the microbial communities in soils in several ways: (1) it may lead to a reduction of total microbial biomass (Brookes and McGrath, 1984;Fliessbach et al, 1994); (2) it decreases numbers of specific populations (Chaudri et al, 1993;Koomen et al, 1990); or (3) it makes shifts in the microbial community structure (Frostegård et al, 1993(Frostegård et al, , 1996Gray and Smith, 2005). Sandaa et al (1999) suggested that the presence of even small amounts of heavy metals caused a substantial reduction in the total bacterial diversity.…”
Section: Remediation Of Heavy Metals By Pgprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os metais pesados podem prejudicar a comunidade microbiana do solo (Insam et al, 1996;Brookes e macgrath, 1984;Fliebbach et al, 1994;Aceves et al, 1999), no entanto, a aplicação dos quelantes EDTA e EDDS, com base nos valores das taxas de degradação analisados neste trabalho, podem ter amenizado estes efeitos. da tabela 3, têm-se taxas de degradação iguais a 50,3%; 19,1% e 16,3% para as doses 250, 500 e 750 mg kg -1 de EDTA e iguais a 247,8%; 102,5%; e 90,8% para as doses 250, 500 e 750 mg kg -1 de EDDS.…”
Section: Solo Contaminadounclassified