2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-010-0265-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil microbial diversity: an ISO standard for soil DNA extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, nucleic acids were precipitated by adding 1 volume of ice-cold isopropanol. The DNA pellets obtained after centrifugation (14,000 g for 5 min at 4°C) were washed with 70% ethanol (full details are described in (Martin-Laurent et al ., 2001 ; Philippot et al ., 2010 ; Petric et al ., 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, nucleic acids were precipitated by adding 1 volume of ice-cold isopropanol. The DNA pellets obtained after centrifugation (14,000 g for 5 min at 4°C) were washed with 70% ethanol (full details are described in (Martin-Laurent et al ., 2001 ; Philippot et al ., 2010 ; Petric et al ., 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, a standardized ‘ISO-11063: Soil quality – Method to directly extract DNA from soil’ was developed and validated by independent laboratories to efficiently recover bacterial DNA from various soil samples (Philippot et al ., 2010 ; Petric et al ., 2011 ). However, archaeal and fungal groups also constitute a significant proportion of the soil microbial biodiversity and are key organisms for soil processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we note that the assessment of microbial biodegradation potential of synthetic pesticides using radiorespirometry is lengthy (generally several weeks) and is not always easy to implement, especially when using radiolabeled pesticides, which require specific authorization delivered by national radioprotection agencies, such as Agence de Sureté Nucléaire (ASN) in France, special laboratories and appropriate treatment of radioactive wastes. One alternative to this method could be the use of molecular approaches based on direct extraction of nucleic acids from environmental matrices and their subsequent analysis by PCR-based approaches to quantify the abundance of pesticide-degrading communities (Philippot et al, 2010). Specific information on the potential of biodegradation can be obtained by examining functional genes encoding enzymes involved in degradation pathways (Smith andOsborn, 2008 andBombach et al, 2010).…”
Section: Did the Ban Of Diuron Lead To A Decrease In The Exposure Levmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humus, contaminants, salts, and many other substances made DNA extraction a crucial and challenging procedure in soil metagenomic studies ( Steffan et al, 1988 ; Tebbe and Vahjen, 1993 ). Soil DNA extraction methods can be divided into direct methods and indirect methods ( Daniel, 2005 ) with the former being more widely used ( Zhou et al, 1996 ; Robe et al, 2003 ; Philippot et al, 2010 ). Moreover, DNA solutions achieved with manual methods were often contaminated by the humus, which would interfere with further PCR amplification and sequencing ( Zhou et al, 1996 ; Arbeli and Fuentes, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely used DNA extraction methods, which also included many commercial kits, usually contained bead-beating lysis steps before further DNA extraction ( Philippot et al, 2010 ; Natarajan et al, 2016 ). Previous studies ( Leff et al, 1995 ; Kauffmann et al, 2004 ; Lakay et al, 2007 ; Purohit and Singh, 2009 ) have reported that higher DNA yield and quality were achieved with the bead beating step than other physical steps, such as freezing and thawing, microwave heating, and liquid nitrogen grinding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%