2017
DOI: 10.1016/bs.agron.2016.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Mineralogy Changes With Different Agricultural Practices During 8-Year Soil Development From the Parent Material of a Mollisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This distribution agrees with previous studies, showing that Cu and Zn in the LExch fraction were mainly covalently bound to organic and inorganic sites (Rao et al, 2008). Clay minerals and organic matter controlling the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soil (Liu et al, 2017) may have favoured Cu and Zn release from vineyard soil (CEC=15.4 cmol + kg -1 , Table S2) compared with crop soil (CEC=9.1 cmol + kg -1 ). In the AFeOx fraction, Cu and Zn were generally associated with amorphous Fe oxides following coprecipitation, adsorption, surface complex formation, ion exchange and/or penetration into the mineral.…”
Section: Distribution Of Cu and Zn Among Chemical Fractionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This distribution agrees with previous studies, showing that Cu and Zn in the LExch fraction were mainly covalently bound to organic and inorganic sites (Rao et al, 2008). Clay minerals and organic matter controlling the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soil (Liu et al, 2017) may have favoured Cu and Zn release from vineyard soil (CEC=15.4 cmol + kg -1 , Table S2) compared with crop soil (CEC=9.1 cmol + kg -1 ). In the AFeOx fraction, Cu and Zn were generally associated with amorphous Fe oxides following coprecipitation, adsorption, surface complex formation, ion exchange and/or penetration into the mineral.…”
Section: Distribution Of Cu and Zn Among Chemical Fractionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This peak was observed in B, C, and D fractions regardless of the type of tillage, with a slight increase of the relative intensity as the fraction size decreased. This was in line with other papers [38][39][40][41] showing that phyllosilicates (kaolinite, chlorite, smectite, illite) are the main components of the clay fraction of soils. The peak at 2927 cm −1 , ascribed to the stretching of the aliphatic C-H group, was evident only in the A fraction, and could be due to the signal of organic matter consisting of labile plant residues [42].…”
Section: Effects Of Treatments On the Amount Of Each Soil Fraction Ansupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The detailed studies (summarised in Table 1) published previously or reported in this volume illustrate this methodology to implement soil characterisation and field experimental data (Rouseva et al, 2016;Regelink et al, 2015;Blaud et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016a,b;Liu et al, 2016) in mathematical modelling studies to quantify changes in soil carbon and structure and the relation of soil structure changes to changes in soil functions (Stamati et al, 2013;Li et al, 2015;Andrianaki et al, 2016); synthesis of modelling results for soil C sequestration, soil aggregation and soil structure development across multiple sites in the USA, Europe and China , application of parameter sets and model simulations to evaluate biophysical flows and transformations that define multiple soil functions (Kotronakis et al, 2016;Giannakis et al, 2016); and their translation into environmental service flows for economic valuation (Jónsson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Overview Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%