2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Moisture Accounting (SMA) based sediment graph models for small watersheds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its popularity, the SCS-CN method has been the object of many studies. These studies focused on application of the method, e.g., in rainfall-runoff modelling [10], analyzing the impact of land use changes such as urbanization on runoff values [11], predicting sediment yield [12,13], as well as on the estimation and verification of the CN parameter [14][15][16][17]. Yet, less attention has been given to the dimensionless initial abstraction ratio (λ), and most often this ratio was assumed equal to 0.20, as it was originally proposed by method's developers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its popularity, the SCS-CN method has been the object of many studies. These studies focused on application of the method, e.g., in rainfall-runoff modelling [10], analyzing the impact of land use changes such as urbanization on runoff values [11], predicting sediment yield [12,13], as well as on the estimation and verification of the CN parameter [14][15][16][17]. Yet, less attention has been given to the dimensionless initial abstraction ratio (λ), and most often this ratio was assumed equal to 0.20, as it was originally proposed by method's developers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhunya et al (2003) proposed reliable expressions to derive shape parameter (n s ) from known q ps (1/hr) and t ps (hr): n s = 5.53 s 1.75 + 1.04 IF(0.01 < s <0.35) & n s = 6.29 s 1.998 + 1.157 IF ( s > 0.35) .. (3a-b) Where,  s = q ps × t ps and q ps = Q PS /Q S [(kg/s)/ (hr).(kg/s)]. Using above IUSG concept, Gupta et al (2019) developed four SGMs denoted as SMA-SGM 1-4 (Table 1).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tyagi et al (2008) developed a time distributed sediment yield model (SYM) utilizing the SCS-CN based infiltration model. More recently, Gupta et al (2019) developed four SGMs based on Nash's IUSG, SCS-CN method and Power law coupled with SMA procedure assuming that if a soil is saturated, rainfall becomes runoff (Michel et al, 2005) adopted in present study to predict SGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In estimating the temporal variation of SS for a storm, the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH) has been used to produce Instantaneous Unit Sediment Graph (IUSG) and then provide SG (Banasik and Mitchell 2008;Bhunya et al 2010;Banasik and Hejduk 2014). Other methods, such as regression analysis (Sadeghi and Saeidi 2010), power model (Bhunya et al 2010), two-parameter gamma distribution function (Singh et al 2013), and SCS-CN method with IUSG (Gupta et al 2019), have also been used for deriving the synthetic SG. The SG has been simulated using hydrograph (Saeedi et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the sediment production in different parts of the watershed was in proportion to the extent of their connection during the year. Gupta et al (2019) modeled the SG for small watersheds using soil moisture under four different conditions in six watersheds, and the estimated values were compared with observed values and the Bhunya et al (2010) Sediment Graph Model (BSGM). Ruben et al (2020) used Acoustic Sediment Estimation Toolbox (ASET) to calculate SS transport in the Paraná River in Argentina to obtain temporal and spatial variations of SSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%