2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17061455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Moisture Content Estimation Based on Sentinel-1 and Auxiliary Earth Observation Products. A Hydrological Approach

Abstract: A methodology for elaborating multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and Landsat 8 satellite images for estimating topsoil Soil Moisture Content (SMC) to support hydrological simulation studies is proposed. After pre-processing the remote sensing data, backscattering coefficient, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), thermal infrared temperature and incidence angle parameters are assessed for their potential to infer ground measurements of SMC, collected at the top 5 cm. A non-linear approach using Artificial Neur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we here focused on cost-effective explanatory SRS data, recent advances in remote sensing technologies provide the possibility to better account for intra-annual differences in habitat characteristics which likely improve SDMs for our study species in the future. Specifically, Sentinel-1 radar images and Sentinel-2 optical images allow to monitor soil moisture content [123] and vegetation status and composition [124,125] at high spatial resolution and high temporal frequency, respectively. Likewise, high resolution satellite imagery (e.g., PlanetScope) or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with multi-and hyperspectral sensors as well as laser scanner systems are very promising in this context by providing high resolution data on micro-habitat, vegetation structure, and topography [126,127].…”
Section: Suggestions For Model Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we here focused on cost-effective explanatory SRS data, recent advances in remote sensing technologies provide the possibility to better account for intra-annual differences in habitat characteristics which likely improve SDMs for our study species in the future. Specifically, Sentinel-1 radar images and Sentinel-2 optical images allow to monitor soil moisture content [123] and vegetation status and composition [124,125] at high spatial resolution and high temporal frequency, respectively. Likewise, high resolution satellite imagery (e.g., PlanetScope) or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with multi-and hyperspectral sensors as well as laser scanner systems are very promising in this context by providing high resolution data on micro-habitat, vegetation structure, and topography [126,127].…”
Section: Suggestions For Model Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, multitemporal remote sensing datasets are considerably valuable for change detection analysis. Importantly, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) systems are proficient resources for determining soil surface roughness because there is a high correlation between the surface roughness and SAR backscattering coefficient (Prigent et al, 2005;Srivastava et al, 2008;MirMazloumi and Sahebi, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016;Alexakis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used ANN models is Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). In this model, sequential neuron layers are interrelated, the weights of which control the connection power (Paloscia et al, 2013;Alexakis et al, 2017). ANNs along with SAR data have also been extensively used for soil roughness estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent decades, artificial neural network (ANN) methods have become widely applied in various approaches of hydrological studies, such as modelling of soil water reserves (Moreira de Melo & Correa Pedrollo 2015; Alexakis et al 2017;Campos de Oliveira et al 2017); modelling and interpolation of precipitation, evapotranspiration and surface water levels (Altunkaynak 2007;Sivapragasam et al 2009;Dadaser-Celik & Cengiz 2013;Deo & Şahin 2015); modelling of groundwater table (GWT) variabilities (Nayak et al 2006;Banerjee et al 2009;models (Deo & Şahin 2015). It utilises the relationships between input parameters and variables by testing data trends as nonlinear regression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%